photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Wm. Bates | all galleries >> Picture a Day for a Year of Wanda Gallery >> Click here for Wanda In September Gallery > Wanda09_21_04.jpg
previous | next
21-SEP-2004

Wanda09_21_04.jpg

Not any great attempt to making more than a snap shot tonight. I just wanted to see how the 20D would preform after sunset. We shot this at dusk in the backyard. It was taken at 1600ISO with no noise reduction run in processing. I did resizes for the web, made a small levels adjustment and added Unsharp Mask filter at 200/.2/1 level. I'm impressed at the lack of noise/grain. With the 10D it would be hard to get a usable image at 1600ISO.

Canon EOS 20D ,Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
1/200s f/4.0 at 135.0mm iso1600 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time21-Sep-2004 19:21:04
MakeCanon
ModelCanon EOS 20D
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length135 mm
Exposure Time1/200 sec
Aperturef/4
ISO Equivalent1600
Exposure Bias
White Balance (-1)
Metering Modepartial (6)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Programaperture priority (3)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium large original auto
comment | share
Wm. Bates02-Apr-2005 15:25
Now this is more MY style of posing! Just go "play" and hope Bill snaps the shot when I don't have too dorky of look on My face! No bending and twisting My body in odd directions to create the "right angle" for a photo! YIPEE!

Wanda
Andre Oliveira 01-Oct-2004 13:38
Mr. Bates,

The picture is great as all that I've seen. Camera's performance is really impressive. I wish I could afford one of my own but in a 3rd World country the price is not so affordable and average salary too small. Just one thing: It doesn't seem as it was taken at dusk but at noon. A darker picture with shadows would be much more stylish altough the camera would indicate it as under exposed.
Gary Blanchette22-Sep-2004 14:28
Well Bill I'm not going to add any Camera tech to my comment, but instead compliment you and Wanda on how the two of you are always able to work together, making any element work. Way to go!
Kenneth Zimmerman22-Sep-2004 12:31
This impresse me to no end.
Shooting night football games or inside sporting events will allow faster shutter speeds. If the $$ were not an issue, I'd have one tommorow, but with 2 kids, a wife and my own wants and needs, it'll be a while before a 20D appears in my camera bag!
As always Bill, your stuff is great!
Thanks for all the tech notes with your photos.
Keep it up.
Lou Giroud22-Sep-2004 11:23
The 8 mpix digic chip processor is beside of the Fuji CCD processor the best when it becomes to speek about noise ratio anyway.
It is nice to have this feature and be able to make good pictures at 1600 ISO, but, on the other side I ask myself so often ; Do you realy need this. My high ISO range button starts rusting on my D70. If you go back to old argentic days, try to remember how often you bought a 400or 800 film. On the other side, managing noise is a question of electronic programm rework in the camera. A Chip is able to take no more then 80 ISO anyway. All the rest is a processing game.
For a 1600 ISO, this picture is indeed very clean.
Guest 22-Sep-2004 06:04
The 20D is impressive. The DIGIC II is outstanding. I'm having sharpness isssues but I don't believe its the 20D...though I had my suspicions until a few tests.

I haven't had the chance to get in-studio with it yet.
Dennis Steinauer22-Sep-2004 05:22
Impressive image quality. (Although I have to admit, from the thumbnail, I thought the dog was tugging on Wanda's jeans, like the old Coppertone ads.)
John Buffin22-Sep-2004 04:30
1600?? Wow! Gotta get me one of these.
Yiannis Pavlis22-Sep-2004 03:06
really impresive levels of noise ,you cant really tell ,i would thought it was from a long lens .so you think we sould go for the 20d .thanks for share your photos and your opinions . regards yiannis.
Guest 22-Sep-2004 03:06
POOR WANDA¡T¡T¡T
Guest 22-Sep-2004 02:46
I like this one. It seems more natural. and most important, we can't see the thick make up clearly.

Look, the dog is having a good time with Wanda.