photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Miljenko Devcic | all galleries >> tech >> Lens reviews and tests > CHEAP_vs_EXPENSIVE.jpg
previous | next
23-JUL-2004

CHEAP_vs_EXPENSIVE.jpg

Nikon D70
1/4000s f/2.8 at 200.0mm iso400 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
comment | share
Miljenko Devcic19-Apr-2006 07:54
Hi Benjammer, using telelens at high apertures is not a realistic option. Even f/5.0 is sometimes to slow for low light/fast moving object situations. This doesn't mean that Sigma 70-300 APO2 is a bad lens. On contrary, it outperforms similary priced OEM telezooms.
Guest 17-Apr-2006 00:51
Besides the colours I Think the cheap lens might be winning at f22, but of course expencive seems better for everything else, which will definetly be more commonly used.