photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Sixteen: Story-telling street photography > Chiado Bus Stop, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004
previous | next
06-SEP-2004

Chiado Bus Stop, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004

Street photography also lends itself to expressing those bonds that tie small groups of people together. Such is the case in this photo, which I made at a bus stop on the slope of a hill in Lisbon’s Chiado neighborhood. This picture is all about unconscious, unacknowledged bonding. Eight strangers, yet together they are forced to create a group that does not acknowledge human contact, at least for the moment. In fact, their body language expresses a sense of resignation. It is ritualistic, orderly, and expectant. I stood across the street from these people, this time using my Leica Digilux 2 at eye level, taking advantage of the detail produced by its remarkable lens, and using its huge LCD screen to compose my image. I could not have asked for a more coherent arrangement of figures – the group has magically composed the picture for me. Two women, wearing pink and red tops, appear as “book ends” on the ends of the tableaux. The three seated figures huddle in the cool shadows of the center, while the two people standing on the inside of the shelter each hold on to something with one hand. The woman at the left end lowers her head to touch it, while the man at the right end supports himself by holding on to the waste receptacle. None of them seem to notice me – they are all focusing on something other than the street shooter on the other side of the avenue. Most likely, they are concerned about the bus that has yet to arrive. I was intrigued by the incongruity of the man who is there, but really not there – appearing only as a phantom on the back side of the bus stop shelter’s frosted glass panel. Another incongruity is created by the sign over their heads, bearing the slogan “good to know you” yet most of these Portuguese people could not read those words, and if they did, their body language would say otherwise. Street photography can offer viewers slices of life that capture the essence of a place. To me, this bus stop represented just such a challenge. What do you see this image as saying? Do you have any questions to ask me about street photography? I welcome your own views on my interpretation of this scene. We can all learn from your comments, your questions, and your critiques on this image, and the other examples in this gallery and in this “cyberbook”. I’ll try to respond as best I can, shaping a dialogue that can greatly enhance your understanding of expressive travel photography. Thank you for viewing this gallery, and hopefully for participating in the discussions that can flow from it.

Leica Digilux 2
1/400s f/6.7 at 19.1mm iso100 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time06-Sep-2004 06:37:48
MakeLeica
ModelDIGILUX 2
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length19.1 mm
Exposure Time1/400 sec
Aperturef/6.7
ISO Equivalent100
Exposure Bias
White Balance (10)
Metering Modematrix (5)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Programprogram (2)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium large original auto
previous | next
share
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2008 18:18
Glad you noted the incongruity of the overhead sign. You are the first to pick up on that, and it makes a big difference in the message here. It tells an entirely different story than the one I started out to express here. thanks so much for pointing it out, Vera.
Guest 24-Jan-2008 13:32
Funny the sign says "good to know you" but these people look so indifferent to one another. Heaven forbid that you strike up a conversation with a stranger at a bus stop. Everyone is in the "leave me alone" mode.
Phil Douglis09-Oct-2004 23:25
I love the digilux and use it often, particularly when fine detail is at the heart of my image. That's because of its f2.0 Leica Summicron lens and oversized 5MP sensor. At ISO 100 it can make images that are, in my view, equal to those made by a DSLR. It also has almost no shutter lag, is much lighter than a DSLR, and I control it very much as I used to control my old analog cameras. it's downside is its limited 28-90mm focal length and its fixed LCD screen. (At least it is huge, and the D2 also has an electronic view finder to look through when it is very very bring outside.)

I use the D2 in tandem with two other cameras in the field. Rodney. I am a big fan of Canon's user friendly cameras and flip out LCDs. They also make wonderful optics. The G-series has been very good to me. I've used both the G2 and the G5 in my work with excellent results, and I just upgraded to the seven megapixel G6. I keep my 24mm wideangle converter on it all the time, which gives me a 24-100mm zoom range, plus flipout LCD. I shoot a lot of wideangle images, and have used the Canon G-series as my workhorses.

My third camera is brand new. I had been using a teleconverter on the G5 taking me out to 245mm, but sometimes felt frustrated, particular when shooting wildlife with such limitations. So I've just added the Panasonic Lumix FZ-20, which takes me from 35mm out to 432mm. It has a Leica Elmarit image stabilized lens on it, which is amazing. The camera is so light, it almost weighs as much as the teleconverter it replaces. I've tested it, but I have not yet used it in the field.

I carry a fourth camera with me when I do not want to be seen as a photographer-- Canon's S-400 digital Elph. I carry it with me everywhere. No bigger than a pack of cigarettes, it is a marvelous tool.

While all these cameras might seem like a lot of gear, it really is not. When I am shooting in the field, I keep the G6 on my neck, and the Leica and Lumix in two hip pouches. No camera bags needed.

As for as your own question about sticking with an SLR, you must make your decision based on the kind of work you do. If your priorities are big prints, a wide range of focal lengths, and shooting fast moving action in long, continuous bursts, you did. The 20D will do all of that for you and do it very well. If, on the other hand, unobtrusive street photography is your greatest pleasure, a good digicam can offer, in my view, considerable advantages over any DSLR.
Guest 09-Oct-2004 22:07
I should say, I was considering the digilux as I find more and more I love street photography, and the leica would be far better to be non-intrusive in the streets, and certainly more quiet. :)
Guest 09-Oct-2004 22:06
Very nice. I really struggled with a choice recently. Upgrade to the Canon 20D or go with Leica Digilux 2 (as the digilux was about same cost of the 20D+17-85 IS lens). I ultimately decided to go with the SLR, as I had two more lenses (50mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/4L) for more 'special situations'. How do you like the digilux 2? I sometimes wonder if I made the right decision to stick with SLR
Phil Douglis18-Sep-2004 05:37
Hi, Tami,

You guessed right. I find myself taking different pictures with different photographers in mind. And this one was a "Tami" all the way. As for your "it's a little dark" comment, you may be judging it by conventional exposure standards. My own exposure intentions were related solely to meaning. I wanted this variation of exposures here, ranging from people in bright sunlight to those huddled in the cool shadows. You don't have to see detail on all the faces -- the body language and spacing tell my story. Exposure, Tami, should always relate to what you are trying to say. Shadows are at the core of my style. I regard them as an abstracting medium, and use them to suggest meaning. What goes on in the imagination of the viewer, as you know from previous discussions we have had, is my most important consideration. When it comes to evaluating exposure, I rarely, if ever, use conventional matrix or evaluative metering, either. It tends to "even" thing out too much for my purposes. Instead, I always use my spot meter, so I can more or less "paint with light." In this shot, I used my spot meter on the brightest part of the picture -- the wall. This eliminated burnout, and made everything else, including those people in the shadows, much darker. So the "little dark" factor you point out, was my own decision.

Thanks, Tami, for this comment. You are helping me teach.
Tami18-Sep-2004 05:03
Well you know I love this!! Good capture. It's a little dark. I don't know if you would have blown out one of you book ends if you changed the exposure.
Tami
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment