photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Konica Minolta Users | all galleries >> KM Challenges >> CX: Textures-Structures - hosted by Lothman >> CX: Textures-Structures - Competition > The name of the rose, by MinoltaManiac
previous | next
18-JUN-2004

The name of the rose, by MinoltaManiac

This one is slightly different than the previous one. And different flower is now here, certainly meaning something different than before. Can you guess what's that actually? ... Well, I hope you'll like this one too.

Click here for hi-res TIFF file of this photo (850 KB)

Minolta DiMAGE A1
1/4s f/5.6 at 15.4mm iso200 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time18-Jun-2004 22:21:10
MakeMinolta
ModelDiMAGE A1
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length15.4 mm
Exposure Time1/4 sec
Aperturef/5.6
ISO Equivalent200
Exposure Bias-2.00
White Balance (-1)
Metering Modematrix (5)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Programaperture priority (3)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share
Konica Minolta Users20-Jun-2004 09:27
I can't decide which one of this one and "Three Buds" I like the best, they are both great images, but your choice of title for this one is perfect, with it's reference to Ecos brilliant novel and Adso's final reflections over his choise of the spiritual world over the material one: "stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus".

Fred
M. Scott Cole19-Jun-2004 15:33
Maniac,
I actually like this image better then the first. It has me wondering about your subject. Is she pissed, or excited, or is she awaiting someone? It just holds more emotion and mystery for me. I also love the use of texture and tone to carry the image, just a hint of graphical erotica yet overwhelming mental erotica. It is indeed an image I can see hanging tastefully on a wall.
Philip Potts 19-Jun-2004 09:14
Hi MM. Of your two shots I like the other one better. While both are virtualy identical, I find the pose of the first more appealing.