Agent Cross has alluded to the presence in Utah of extended-range multi-channel analyzers (ERMCAs; see this image about a de Broglie Detector). Although one cannot see an ERMCA in this image, the image itself is proof that they exist here. I will explain.
This is a normal exposure in daylight on a sunny day. The night exposure effect is produced by the fratostatic coupling of an array of ERMCAs. Those in the know call it the Clear Lake Effect. Consumer cameras cannot capture this effect. I used a highly-sensitive device that uses regurgitative pseudo-mesons to translate what one sees into what one wishes to see. This facility is as secure as they come, which means that I could get no closer than this without endangering my health.
Thank you, Larry, for the PIP recommendation. Though I crave recognition in most forms, the only award I seriously lust after is the so-called Crystal Mark, documented by John Cooper (http://www.pbase.com/image/67709639 ). Thus, is there any chance that the recommendation could be redirected toward cold hard cash? At the time that this image was recorded the only sounds were those of a gentle breeze caressing the grass, and the Celine Dion ring tone of my cell phone (Moab calls constantly). To the best of my knowledge, no sounds within the range of frequencies detectable by humans emanated from the facility.
Bravo, Agent Beedon. I am recommending you for a P.I.P. award. Pride in Performance in case you've forgotten. You've been in the field so long.
From your detailed description I understand the science of not being able to capture a VISUAL of this phenomenom and.......
I don't want to get my hopes up but is there any chance whatever that we we cannot HEAR anything coming from this location?
My fingers are crossed that Celine Dion is sent there.
I'm wondering how you classified the location. By size? state? brightness (or darkness)? Or is it simply classified "classified." I'd be grateful if you'd shed some dark on this subject.