lesbian true love Photo Gallery by Henrik S. at pbase.com

lesbian true love

These are two young women who are in love with each other. I took these pictures because I was curious. There has been a lot of debate in Denmark about if gay couples should be allowed to get married. Look at these pictures with me. I cannot see why they should not. Can you? Let me know what you think.

Yours sincerely,
Henrik
Denmark

pages 1 2 ALL

Line & Sarah	Line & Sarah	Line & Sarah	Sarah
Line & Sarah	Line & Sarah

pages 1 2 ALL

comment |

Guest		11-Oct-2012 10:26
I love this nd these grl's r looking awesome together

Guest		11-Oct-2012 10:12
I love this nd these grl's r looking awesome together

Guest		29-Oct-2011 21:45
We have been a " WE " for three years. Yes .... love is love and selects not the the persons but the souls that belong together. Allowing us to be married is not yet accepted by law. When it does happen, we will be first in line. We are both widows with family that fully support our relationship. So we will continue living in Catholic sin amid our very private home We have just today discovered your beautiful devoted galleries. YES, this very sweet young couple should have the freedom of choice of there public relationship. ~~~ Deana & Bunny

ML		15-May-2009 07:16
love is love is love...like gertrude stein made clear with the rose. When your heart really makes it known that you want nothing other than to be with that being, regardless of gender, and even just being in the same room with them and/or just listening to them breathe brings warmth and a smile, THAT is what matters. Love the pictures, beautiful. People in love, there can never be enough of it. For every moment of unfortunate hate, there are moments like these, or the man and woman walking down the street who love each other so wonderfully that we all benefit. Don't care who falls in love with whom, who you are captured by, it's just always important to be ready for it and to let it happen. Love is never not a good thing. Really nice photos, great subjects too, nice work

Iren		16-Jun-2008 18:32
These pictures are sureal! Your eye in the lense is amazing! The attire is completely defenitive of them knowing themselves and each other; you captured that. I notice that the first comments were posted in 2005. Can you advise how the happy couple has progressed over the past three years?

Guest		15-Dec-2006 09:45
wow!!! thank you... beautiful!! I hope that it will be me up there one day...

Shannon Holland		24-Aug-2006 01:37
I think these pictures are absolutely beautiful!! It is my wish to one day be able to marry the womyn that I love too. Some say, well isn't it enough that you can love? Why do you have to use the term marriage? Marriage is a special union that two people can share and I don't think that because my lover is a womyn, that I should be denied such a pleasure. I pray that someday our government will just mind their own business and realize that my life does not fit their religion and vice versa BUT we can still exist peacefully. We the people... means everyone.

Guest		10-Jul-2006 01:45
Why not???!!!

Guest		09-Jul-2006 13:59
Simply put, you cannot help who you fall in love with. You love who your heart goes out to. No matter what sex, race, color, species or etc. they are. And if the two, or three or etc. of you all want to marry, then you all should have the legal right to. And noone should should be allowed to prevent you from doing that. We cannot continue to have a free society as we have enjoyed. If we keep making laws that violate our freedoms. Enough said. Have a good day Congratulations to the happy couple. By the way, I personally am a straight christian man from the U.S. Have a good day.

Guest		15-Jun-2006 21:09
Wow - never have I seen a portfolio generate so much dialog! Seth - interesting and thoughtful comments - my reply to those: Marriage is a religious institution, possibly a social institution. For some unknown (to me and many) reason, governments have decided to bestow certain benefits to "married" couples that they do not provide to unmarried peoples. In the US, where church and state are by law, supposed to be seperate, we find that many laws are indeed wrapped up in religious overtones. One should ask what the government is doing in somebody elses personal life - a life that harms no one. I believe the solution is simple. If for whatever reason(s) government feels that two people in a relationship should somehow be differentiated from unattached people(s), then change the wording of all such laws and regulations from marriage/married to "civily joined/partnered" so that any two people in a so "recognized" relationship can enjoy the benefits and privileges that governments seem to want to provide to such unions. And to satisfy the religious minded people who think of marriage as something holy, let them continue to think so, let them continue to recognize marriage by any definition they choose, so long as they don't try to force their own belief and prejudices on others outside of their own church.

kyoung kim photography		21-May-2006 07:56
beautiful gallery!

Ashtonian		19-May-2006 20:12
Excellent photos. To answer your question, I have no idea what marraige means. I was in one of those and my wife destroyed it at considerable financial penalty. Today none of my siblings remain married. To me then, marraige is irrelevant and a qaint function of a bygone era. I just think that there should be some legal rights for a couple that have set up a life for themselves. Rights that allow visiting your partner in hospital, instead of the 'family only' rule. Right to property and so on. I however do understand and respect the reluctance of some on this issue but would ask for some tolerance and understanding from everybody.

Guest		13-May-2006 04:45
I love the pictures! =) I think that Sarah & Line should be able to marry. They look incredibly happy to me, as long as they love each other I don't see why they shoulden't get married. But it is a shame that the Denmark government dosn't agree with the gay couple laws. Personaly I think that it should be legal to marry who ever you would like as long it is in the age limit. I honestly hope that these two beatiful young women can fufil thier dreams in living an amazingly happy life together.

Guest		02-May-2006 02:00
I love your pictures. They made me smile so much. I agree with you, these two women have the right to be in love and be married just like anyone else...I have a girlfriend who I love with all of my heart and seeing those pictures made me think of us. I want to marry her so bad...it would be so perfect. I guess we just have to find the right place to do it. <3 babygirl

Mort		29-Apr-2006 02:41
Excellent photos, you can't be praised enough. With that said, time to enter the fray: I don't support gay marriage, I support lesbian marriage. LOL! But seriously, I don't think the question is should homosexual marriages be allowed but when. If you ask me, now is the not the time. And I'm not talking about the Christian nonsense that's already been discussed; it's actually the secular community that needs to get it's act together. See, to a lot of people (especially most young people, the word "gay" doesn't mean loving the same sex. For them, it's a synonym for "stupid" or "lame". Likewise, "faggot" and "dyke" are seen as acceptable replacements for "loser" or "dork". The entertainment industry isn't really helping matters. There's an awful lot of gay-bashing in popular movies like Dodgeball and the 40 Year Old Virgin, music like Eminem, and TV shows like Family Guy. As long as this kind of thing is perceived to be the norm, no true progress can be made, regardless of which party controls the White House.

Guest		04-Apr-2006 13:59
To confused: I don't know why one wears the pants and one the dress.. I'm a lesbian myself and I wear skirts and pants or whatever I'm comfortable in. For the sake of marriage and the traditionality of it all, i.e, wedding gown and tux, I suppose that's up to the couple and what they feel like doing. I think it's different for every situation. Sure, masculine females and feminine males could hook up and reverse roles, but who's to say that would make them happy? I find a lot of people just go with the flow and like what they like, and aren't looking for someone to reverse roles with. If you click with someone, you just click. Most gay women do not hate men. Some of my best friends are guys, and I find they are the easiest ones to talk to about girls because they relate! I think it's a bit of a "male member" thing, as you call it, because it's a male thing.. we like guys, we just don't want to have sex with them. With a strap on, it's not used because it reminds us of men, it's used because it works to get the job done, if you catch my drift. For me, the emotional attachment with guys only goes as far as friendship. I don't believe we choose the gender and then fall in love.. being gay isn't a choice, it's what you are. I just have a stronger emotional attachment to women than I do to men, and women are just beautiful. Women understand what another woman is going through. It's physical and emotional... it's a reaction and a feeling. I hope this helped out a little. On the topic of these pictures, they're beautiful. :) I hope Denmark allows gay marriage.

confused		31-Mar-2006 21:31
I don't understand why whenever I see a lesbian couple, one is masculine and the other is feminine. Who got to chose which wore the dress and which one the pants? Is it because one has masculine tendencies? I'm just trying to understand here. If that is the case couldn't more masculine females hook up with feminine men where at least they could reverse rolls and be happy? Do gay women hate men? Is it a male member thing? I think not because they strap them on right? This is all so confusing to me because I don't know any lesbian women to ask them. I'm not talking about falling in love here. It seems that many gay folk chose the gender and then fall in love, right? So there must be something about males that lesbians don't like. Again, I'm just trying to figure this out. Is it that men are not tender enough for them? Is it physical? Emotional? What?

Guest		19-Jan-2006 18:34
If marriage is such a religeous thing why is it OK for 2 atheists to be married by a justice of the peace. Or 2 Wiccans can be married as well. Does this mean god likes Atheists and Wiccans but does not like Homosexual people who worship him and go to his churches? I feel any 2 adults should be able to marry anyone they want wether they are straight, gay, bi, les or trans.

Seth		02-Jan-2006 18:15
Wonderful photographs, Henrik. They are well done and capture the people and the moment. They are two lovely ladies, who look like they are in love, and who look like wonderful people. The fact that they are beautiful, good, or in love, however, are not good reasons to allow them to marry. Marriage is an institution that has always been defined between people of the opposite sex. That alone, however, is not a good reason to keep it the way it is, but it should make us pause and have very good reasons before we change it. Going back to Plato, who wasn't against homosexual love, marriage was between a man and a woman. Here are three thoughts about the homosexual marriage debate. 1. Love, consent, etc, are not legal or moral grounds for marriage. There can be love between siblings, children and parents, children and children, and there can be a desire for marriage between these groups, but society does not allow children to marry children, parents to marry children, or siblings to marry siblings. Thus, marriage is already legalized, and societies around the world have determined that certain marriages are not good for society. Lesbian or homosexual marriages are not good for society either, and there are no compelling reasons to change the age-old institution. 2. Homosexual marriage should be made illegal, because states(meaning government) should only legalize things that are helpful for the state as a whole. When a state legalizes a behavior, they are saying that the behavior is not detrimental to a state, and when they make it illegal, they are saying the behavior is detrimental to a state. Lesbian or gay marriages, if they became the norm for society, would lead to the end of civilized society, because there is no natural way for them to concieve children and if there are no children being reproduced, there is no one to take care of the old, or live in the future. Furthermore, if they had children, the statistics show that children thrive best in a family with a mom and a dad, not two moms or two dads. 3. One should express an opinion without digressing into ad hominem arguments and hateful speech. This is a two-way street. There are people who are against homosexual marriage who say "God hates gays" "Homosexuals are evil" and things like that. That is not going to help the discussion and it is wrong. First, if they want to bring religion into the discussion, at least from a Christian standpoint, they must acknowledge that God(in the Christian sense) has always been defined as all-loving. This does not mean that he loves all activities (murder, rape, homosexuality, needless destruction of forests) are all considered wrong, from the Bible. He loves all people but he does not love all the behavior that people are involved in. One can love a murderer while absolutely abhor the murderous behavior that one was involved in. Second, it is the behavior and not the person doing the behavior, that is unacceptable. To confuse the two is to make a drastic error. On the other hand, those who believe homosexuals should be allowed to marry and that homosexuality is good, need to be tolerant to those who disagree with them. I have seen just as much name-calling coming from pro-homosexual folks at those who disagree with them, and oft-times much more. One can't promote "tolerance" while at the same time behave in an intolerant way. One can't be calling people "bigots" "hatemongers" for disagreeing with a behavior. If they are out there beating up people who are homosexuals, then their behavior is truly hateful, thus the words would apply. If they are engaged in a civil disagreement and want to voice their opinion on it, they have that right and those who are pro-homosexual should acknowledge their right to speech graciously. Those are my thoughts. Have a good day. Seth

ernst		21-Dec-2005 20:21
To Kristen , save your demented opinion. Marrage is a sacrament of the Catholic church and is defined as a union between man and woman. Nobody says you HOMO's can't have a union with all the legal rights that also come with marrage. You just can't call it marrage. It doesen't fit the definition. (As defined by the people who invented it!!) Get it???? Duh

Guest		29-Nov-2005 19:04
I'm well into women who drink from the furry cup. (As long as they are not big old bloaters)

Kristen Stolarz		09-Nov-2005 02:05
The pictures are great. You can really see the love between these two women. On the subject of gay relationships... It's sad how 'Guest' thinks that homosexuality and gay relationships or lifestyles are being 'forced' upon our society. Nobody should be denied of the person they love because of their gender. Thats like not allowing marriage between races, or marrage between larger age gaps. If these situations are allowed, why cant gay marriages be allowed? Gay marriage isnt being forced upon anybody. If someone were to tell you that you had to marry a guy if you were a guy, or a girl if you were a girl, that would be forcing. However, that is not the case. It seems that somebody is simply feeling threatened or insecure about ideas that they are not used to and do not want to accept. In accordance to telling children about gay relationships... I think that the person being asked should just tell their kid the truth. That yes, it is two guys/girls and there is nothing wrong with that. That as long as you love your mate it is okay to be whatever you are, whether heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transsexual etc.

Guest		08-Oct-2005 02:14
I like the photography in this gallery. Images are nicely composed. Creative lighting and saturation. Overall, very well done.

Guest		05-Oct-2005 22:20
THIS IS A HOAX you silly people...

Micky Dee		05-Oct-2005 22:19
go girls! get into it and love the donut dunkin! yeah...

Guest		05-Oct-2005 15:21
Oh my! Where to begin? My favorite comments, meaning the ones I hate the most, are from those persons equating the true love between these women to bestiality and incest. Some even seem to think that should we "accept" their behavior without making them pay the price of derision, and worse, that we will soon slip into sanctioning those activities as well. GET REAL! I wont even begin to explain the differences here since those who made those comments undoubtedly do not posess the intelligence to understand them. The real sickness in society today is not who is doing what with whom but our casual acceptance of violence at home and abroad AND the joining of the two in popular culture. It seems homsexuality is the ONLY thing we cannot seem to desensitize ourselves to. Every other atrocity is tolerated with aplomb. Wake up, its not gay people who are destroying our world!

Guest		05-Oct-2005 14:59
I love all the guest posts. They are too scared to use their true user name.

Guest		04-Oct-2005 16:13
Let's not forget: it's all about LOVE... Who cares about sexes? Just a few decades ago, people were shocked about different races having a relation. LOVE! And by the way, great pictures, that's where pbase is about...

Guest		03-Oct-2005 10:27
Any chance of a conversion?

Guest		28-Sep-2005 16:42
Oh well the photos are great and you are talented. About the topic .... I don't understand the reason why gay couples will be allowed to get married in a world of divorced .... Single is better.

Guest		15-Sep-2005 00:43
great pictures. i disagree with the comment by "guest". it isn't being forced down anyone's throat. it's a big debate (here in the u.s. anyway) because it goes against the law of equal rights. to you it "sucks" because of what it represents and that it should be kept private, but if it were a hetero couple, then no doubt you would be more than praising it. but hey, free speech, free press, etc. and what's wrong with parent's having to explain it to their children? it's one of the good ways to show your kids the meaning of acceptance rather than raising them to be close minded or misinformed. hate crimes start at home.

Guest		28-Aug-2005 09:53
The problem with having laws about Gay marriage is that it then becomes a privlige. It two people of the same sex want to marry, and a justice of peace or preacher is willing to marry them, so what. Let them do what they want. I don't approve, but I also don't judge them in the end. However, I do have a problem with it being forced down my throat, and also seeing parents of innocent children having to explain why it is being forced down society's throat. Keep it private, that's where it should be. That means keep the pictures to yourself as well. The gallery sucks because of what it represents. It represents an attempt to force values through visuals upon a society. Humans typically "get used to" or accept situations and things after they have been "forced" to see them over and over. This is your attempt.

zen		09-Aug-2005 08:47
first of all great pics i have a theory, my theory is u are born gay, bi, or striaght, it's just a matter of will you accept it or not. that being said, anyone can fall in love, why should two people not be allowed to marry and make that eternal commetment to each other? i myself am gay, and in love. I live in the USA and it is considered "wrong" to be gay, my girlfriend and i take a lot of heat, and we can not get married, because of our government as well. However, for those of you like us in other areas of the world, we have given each other vouls, rings, basicly the whole shindig, it is just not leagally binding. We don't care, love is love, there is no grey area. Why should straights be alowd to marry and not gays? They shouldn't. oh, and give my congratulations to the happy cupple

george		04-Aug-2005 17:10
Excellent I love lesbians and I love taints http://ilovetaints.com

Guest		25-Jul-2005 09:55
Same opinion as Jonathan, & very beautiful pictures t0o ;)

Jonathan		16-Jul-2005 17:43
Good luck to them. I detest labels. Lesbian, Gay, Straight, Bi. They're all irrelevant. People are people. Love is Universal. They're two people who are obviously in love. Fair play to them. I hope they'll be happy.

Ed		16-Jul-2005 11:08
Who Cares if they are Lesbians, they are beautiful pictures of two beautiful women

Jock Strap		15-Jul-2005 06:50
To guest below - with IVF and GE any genes can be passed on. If homosexuality was mother natures way of natural selection she's been a bit slow. better luck next time.

Guest		14-Jul-2005 20:00
I am a physician.My understanding of homasexal issue as following;1)homasexal behavior(sexal orientation) has been "setup" or program mainly when the fetus formed,sure the enviroment(such as use drugs) or behavior motification can change some,but not much.2)Because above reasion should not classifed as moral or inmoral behavor.3)But for a scientific point of view,because this behavor will prevent them to transmite their parents gene(good or bad) to their next generation then consider are not good for their race.4)For free society,people should understand and respect their choice and they shoul enjoy same legal right.

Langer Johnson		11-Jul-2005 01:27
This is very good work and a great display of artistic expression. Well done. The same type of work can be found at this other PBase gallery -http://www.pbase.com/kdgraben/rate_my_crack

Tina Smoo		06-Jul-2005 22:23
for fck sake all these peoples opinions are boring. that's my opinion.

Melissa		17-Jun-2005 15:36
Wonderful photos!!!! I'm a bi-sexual Pagan American woman who has been happily married to a man for 10 years. All the Christian people who are so up in arms about gay marriage need to understand is that it is not gay marriage that threatens the sanctity of heterosexual marriage, it is all the single, straight men and women who do. Why should I have a problem with whom someone wants to love? If I had the power to change this law around the world so anyone could marry anyone they wanted to, I would!!!!

Guest		16-Jun-2005 10:27
Come over to our team!

Live for God		15-Jun-2005 21:07
God is Perfect! it is us that are all twisted about. Just remember that only one person, Jesus Christ (God in flesh) gave up his life so all of us could be saved.

Wanna Be Friends		15-Jun-2005 20:59
Heinrik and company, Life doesn't have to be this difficult. Death will put us all on an even playing field. Is having fun today worth an eternity of punishment? If you cannot see God did a wonderful job making both of these beautiful lasses you're blind. They are great portraits. If Gay people could somehow make their own babies then it would be natural. Without a lot of money and some outside help their is no way to procreate if one CHOOSES to be gay. Therefore it is un-natural. Not love but something else drives people to force their views on others, and the 10% gay people are the ones who need to own the hatred that's perpetuated in our world of peace. Not that your pictures aren't fabulous. I think that caring for each other is a same sex issue. But without the sex. Let us be friends without making gay love this important.

Guest		15-Jun-2005 20:30
I am a heterosexual male living in in the US. However, I believe one's sexual orientation is entirely a private matter. It's not my thing. I don't hang out at establishments that cater to the gay community. But, I feel live and let live. I suspect that one of the minor reasons God invented gays was to give Bible-thumping Evangelical Creationist morons something to do that might destract them from doing even more harm than they have done to this country that used to be free until about 5 years ago.

what'snottoloveaboutlesbian		15-Jun-2005 00:58
Nothing better than watch two lesbians making out. I am sure they will have bright future in sex industry if they choose to do so. Congratulations for your coming-out party.

Ribald		14-Jun-2005 22:55
There are more gay people in the world than Americans...

Guest		11-Jun-2005 05:11
Sukov, you have every right to feel however you want about anything (at least at this point, if you are in America...not so sure about the future, though). However, when the "majority" begins using their voting power to restrict the rights of other people and discriminate against them in an attempt to control their behavior, "feelings" and "beliefs" begin to turn into "actions" and outward controls - in effect, a kind of outward violence. America likes to tout "freedom", even as it is busy restricting freedom - both internally and externally. Usually those who find it necessary to talk about their own freedom really aren't free. Some people believe it's a life "style" - perhaps because their God is perfect and couldn't/wouldn't create homosexual people, so therefore it must be a lifestyle choice or a "sickness".....but again - why would 10-20% of the population willingly choose to be discriminated against? Do you know any gay people? Ask them if it's a "lifestyle choice".

Guest		11-Jun-2005 00:58
You expect intelligence or compassion from conservatives? hahahahaha. Not bloody likely. Violence, and hate-speech is what you get from those morons.

Dave Wyman		10-Jun-2005 06:41
>Official recognition and rewarding of "marriage" is important to society as it encourages the fundamental building block of a mother/father environment for developing the next generation.<'' But this is not a reason for banning gay marriage. With your line of reasoning carried to its logical conclusion, we would ban the marriage of people who can't have children because of old age, injury, illness, etc. And of course we don't do this.

Guest		10-Jun-2005 06:06
The issue lies in attempting to control the behavior of other people you have never met and probably never will...why does it make a difference to you? Why do you want to control others so badly?

Steve		10-Jun-2005 06:00
why do these americans have to reduce everything to either "republican or democrat (liberal)". guys, the rest of the world doesn't give a fuck! about time you thought outside your little -5% of the worlds population box.

Sukov		10-Jun-2005 02:39
Tolerance in action eh, Guest? Looks like the hatred came come from both sides. Well to answer your question, the idea that homosexual activity is immoral is hardly a new concept - been around for a very long time.

Guest		10-Jun-2005 01:03
Holy crap, I think Sukov has to be the biggest fucking retard on the face of the planet. Since when is love between two consenting adults subject to morality? Go back under your republican rock, you fucking moron.

Anthony Mohamed (Canada)		09-Jun-2005 21:11
Congratulations on these beautiful pictures. Love is such a wonderful thing and I wish it upon all readers. Marriage, the public annoucement of commitment, should be a choice for all who want to pursue it, whether gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans, intersexed or heterosexual. For those opposed to non-heterosexual marriage, there are truly larger issues to worry about such as war, violence, poverty and the mistreatment of people just because they may be different from yourself.

Guest		09-Jun-2005 19:06
There is nothing stopping Gay people from getting married. The same laws apply to everyone. Just as a strait person has the restriction to marry someone of the same sex, family members, or multiple people, the same laws apply to gay people. The law is completely blind of sexual orientation. By making this a 'gay marriage' issue, it is causing a special category for gay people instead of treating them equally. Do you really want to be put into a box as something 'different' or would you rather address this in the most logical legal way that leaves everyone as equal? If you want to win this argument, you should not fight for 'gay marriage' but instead fight for privacy in marriage contracts, just like other contracts. It is illegal to ask one's sex in every contract except marriage. Instead fight for this as a privacy issue and it will get you the same result without having gay people put into a box as 'different' and needing special laws..

Sukov		09-Jun-2005 18:18
In response to Guest below who asks: "What gives you the right to judge anyone else?" I'll respond by asking what gives you the right to judge other people's judging? Do you some how feel superior to those who might be offended by these pictures? Does your version of truth apply to everyone, even to those who might think a homosexual lifestyle is wrong? Also, whether homosexuality is biological, chosen, or developmental, none of these can conclusively decide the morality of acting on it. But regarding the question of this page (same-sex marriage), an argument can be made that same-sex unions should not be treated equally without ever commenting on the moral status of homosexual relationships.

Ilan Rosen		08-Jun-2005 12:28
Hi I too have a page with gay and "normal" signs of love, and it is my most commented on gallery, with a lot of hatred for what can be seen as pure love. Your gallery is much more powerful as it is really pure love with beautiful and delicate pictures. I really hope that people will let other be, to live their life the way they want Peace on all Ilan

Guest		08-Jun-2005 02:34
If these beautiful photographs offend you in any way, please ask yourself: What gives you the right to judge anyone else? Does your version of the truth apply to everyone you see, regardless of their reality? Or, is it for you only? Danger here is when your internal conflict is turned outward...where does it stop? Do you think that people choose to be the way they are simply to "stir up hate"? Why would they want to do this? Think for just a minute. Why would a person "choose" to be gay if it meant "stirring up hate"? Do you believe people actually derive joy from making people like you hate them? Do you envision them secretly smiling at your disgust? If so, what reaction would you turn outward - just words, or would you go past that? Would you be likely to act violently and afterwards blame your violent acts on the object of your hatred (i.e. "it's not my fault, it's their fault for making me hate them)? Do you have any right to restrict the rights of other people? If you think you do, is it because you somehow feel superior to them?

Guest		07-Jun-2005 21:46
Very nice gallery and im a Communist so i support your gallery and how showed how much 2 people love eached other of same sex.

Guest		07-Jun-2005 18:20
Marriage is different in each culture and an ever-changing institution within them. Only recently did people marry for love or were able to get a divorce. Marriage between different races has only been legal in the States for a little over thirty-five years. As well, it wasn't too long ago that women were more or less considered property (and still are in some societies). Thus, a marriage among equals is a radically new concept. I could go on. Argue whether marriage between same-sex couples should happen in it's own right, not because of some absurd bogeyman perceived to be down the road or some imagined stability of the institution of marriage. The people who are leading the charge against gay marriage are the same extremists who used to play rock records backwards to find "Satanic messages." Nice pics, btw. Cute couple.

Surya		07-Jun-2005 14:10
I am not participating in debate. But I cann't stop myself to say : You have taken beautiful shots of beautiful women. Excellent composition.tones and colours...colours of colours and colours of life. Regards, 'Surya' from India http://www.revatusurya.com

Guest		07-Jun-2005 12:18
I wouldn't say Republicans/Conservatives are unable to accept what is different. I just believe that genetically they're too stupid to comprehend anything that doesn't look like them, which explains why they're so into incest, and why those morons always think about marrying an animal...because you all know they have a favorite goat or sheep that they've had their eye on, and they're secretly hoping to one day legally marry it...because they've been having sex with it for year.

Erika G.		07-Jun-2005 10:35
Nice and interesting gallery. If two people love each other then why they should not be able to marry? Love is not only between a man and a woman. It is not only because of children... How many of you (of these ones who have posted your negative untolerant comments) have sex just because of children? For some people (religious and conservative ones) it is hard and scary to accept people who are different. Nature loves variety. Society often hates it... sadly enough.

Guest		07-Jun-2005 09:25
When the time comes for children, I will be the first to offer my services !!

jj		07-Jun-2005 04:45
Should they? Shouldn't they? That is up to them. The only thing the hits me about this gallery is "it is GREAT photography." Beautiful images of beautiful people. Thanks for sharing it with us.

Guest		07-Jun-2005 04:13
Soon, we will also see ppl marrying their pets, like dogs, cats, may be bunnies! :) or may be child marriage too. They will tell you that, as long as they are happy (including their pets), and doing no harm to others, they have the right to do what ever they like.. and all sort of reason that will make you look bad for speaking against them. Sigh!

I Care		07-Jun-2005 03:33
Yes indeed they are in love and they are happy. Wish them all the best. We are not to despise them it's their choice after all. But the thing is, if we slowly accept that, can we also slowly accept a brother married to his own sister, a father married to his own daughter, a mother married to to his own son??? What will the world be like then.....???

Guest		06-Jun-2005 23:51
Two persons who love eachother form a family, and family is the base of sociaty. Of course two lesbians or gay should marry if they wish. Marriage does not have to be between a man and a woman, why? and if they can have children is not a problem, there are already so many. Besides In holland homosexuals adopt children and make family since 20 years , and the sociaty did not change a thing because of this. I dont see why is more natural if one of the girls is dress as a man, two girsl is white can be equally nice. Anyway, you have the right to delite from your album the comments from people who try to impose their version of religion to all of us. Is your album after all.

Guest		06-Jun-2005 01:01
A good marriage is difficult. Why add unnecessary restrictions? If two people find happiness together, they are most fortunate. Others should mind their own business. Excellent phogography, by the way.

Guest		05-Jun-2005 18:52
I agree !!!!!!!!! why don't she have the right to be happy as us ... "normal" poeple ...I really for gay mariage ;-)) and don't forget your pictures are really nice , great shots , the kiss is the most reprensentive picture of their union and their happiness ced Belgium

Tom Jackson		05-Jun-2005 14:10
You've truly captured their happiness together. Great pictures.

Guest		05-Jun-2005 13:53
Don't worry. The negative comments are just from Republicans too repressed after years of incest and divorces to appreciate anything as beautiful as what's depicted in these pictures.

colin		05-Jun-2005 13:31
Of course they should be able to marry. The fact that this is even a topic of discussion in is a bit shocking, but judging by some of the other comments you have gotten I guess there is still need for discussion.

SERRI AA L		05-Jun-2005 06:39
Furthermore... In Denmark can I marry 2 girls?? I love scandinavian chicks!!!

SERRI AA L		05-Jun-2005 06:31
I enter this site to view photographic style, and share ideas. Why is it pictures of violence & extreme poverty dont stir such reactions? ANYWAY... I dont care either way, what union people have in their lives.

L.H. Puttgrass		05-Jun-2005 02:08
THESE PICTURES MAKE ME SO HAPPY I HAVE TO GRAB MY MONITOR AND SHOVE IT DOWN MY PANTS! MORE GIRLS SCHNOGGING! MORE LESBIAN FROTTAGE! SHOOT ALL THE LAWYERS!! MORE SKIN ON HBO!!! L.H. PUTTGRASS SIGNING OFF AND HEADING FOR THE TUB!

susan		05-Jun-2005 01:11
Beautiful pictures. I was trying to decide if I prefer the black and white with the old world feeling, or the soft green that sets off the women and the carriage so perfectly...hard to decide, but I love them all, really lovely...don't like the debate, it seems silly and overdone, but thanks for sharing the photos...

guest		04-Jun-2005 20:32
one of them has dressed up as a man - i suspect she plays that role in the relationship as well. heck, they can do whatever they please but get married? isn't that a little far fetched? If every couple in Denmark, and elsewhere, were gay then what will Denmark be like in say, fifty years? go peddle your bs elsewhere henrik.

Guest		04-Jun-2005 14:40
SICK. HOW THEY MATE? WITH RUBBER DICK? DIRTY MIND

Ron Wright		04-Jun-2005 13:06
Two beautiful women who seem happy together - what's not to like? And for those who find this "disgusting", I would suggest they mind their own damn business, get a life, and worry about some real problems in the world (like maybe Bush's ongoing crimes against humanity in Iraq). This gallery gets my vote.

Haydn Greenow		04-Jun-2005 11:52
unatural and disgusting

Guest		04-Jun-2005 02:39
beautiful, thoughtful

Brian		04-Jun-2005 02:17
Beauty, as they say is more then skin deep. View these pics and your sure to see. Don't judge people on their sexuality, and don't judge the photographer on the content. Wonderful pictures.

Guest		04-Jun-2005 01:47
When you take pictures of someone wedding thier dog,or thier dead uncle arnie's stinking corpse let me know...I'd like to see THOSE pictures

mic_hong		03-Jun-2005 19:50
They are also human beings just like all human beings. Who are we to judge them? Nice pictures depicting a beautiful relationship...

Peter Chou		03-Jun-2005 16:40
Provocative images! Voted

Just another opinion		03-Jun-2005 16:30
Maybe laws should be enforced to only allow man w/ man and woman w/ woman. That way within a generation mankind could successfully rid the evolutionary process of its current flaw.

john yung		03-Jun-2005 15:09
Dear Henrik, Like all commercial advertisment you are using nice photos and 2 young and beautiful women to sell your point of view. I am curious to know why this kind of relationship still needs a debate in the western world. john yung

Guest		03-Jun-2005 14:23
As a Republican, I only wish to see pictures of people killing one another. Sex and love have no place in society. Just violence and divorce please.

Guest		03-Jun-2005 13:57
Wonderful gallery! I hope some day people could marry their own parents, pets and even kitchen appliances. Brave new world!

Ronald Gale Johnson		03-Jun-2005 07:15
Picture wise? Great photos capturing lots of feelings and love. Morally and socially correct? ...comments here are not the place to address those points. Thanks for sharing these images.

sam boyd		03-Jun-2005 05:37
henrik, this is a heart-warming gallery. since you ask, we have seen enough 'heterosexual only' marriages cause immense hurt and shame. so, my feeling is that 'marriage' should be a word for all union of lovers irrespective gender; for others, let us call many of the traditional unions just 'legalized relationships.' happily, in my country, canada, (as jude also points out) marriage is legal irrespective of gender. best, p/s

Jude Marion		03-Jun-2005 02:36
Henrik, these are goreous photos ... a sense of trafitional wedding photos with a distinctive edge. Very nice! Same sex marriages are allowed in Canada ... and I think it's wonderful. Love is an illusive thing to find ... if two people are able to find it, it's fabulous - regardless of their sex, or race or any other criteria people might wish to use to veto it. Hetro couples are permitted to marry as a means of expressing their committment to each other ... I think ALL couples should be given the same opportunity.

Doug Frost		03-Jun-2005 02:06
This gallery gets my vote. These are wonderful portraits of two people who obviously care very deeply for each other. As to whether or not I think they should be allowed to get married... Well, I tend to be in favor of allowing gay couples to enter into a civil union rather than something called a "marriage", per se. I think the traditional meaning of the term "marriage" should be respected by reserving it for heterosexual unions. But I also think that civil unions between gay people should provide all the legal benefits and carry all the same legal obligations of a traditional marriage. So in the practical, legal sense it would be indistiguishable from a marriage. Granted, it's kind of splitting hairs, but I think it's a reasonable middle ground that addresses the concerns of people on both sides of this issue. And I expect I'll be flamed by both sides over this, too.

Tom		03-Jun-2005 00:02
Hello, my compliments for your nice photos! Please come see my photos sometime? Best regards, Tom from The Netherlands. http://tomjutte.fotopic.net .

Kent		02-Jun-2005 18:50
Let them do it without trying to get the rest of us to give them approval. Quit trying to impose un-natural relationships as somehow beautiful. Cats don't mate with monkeys. It is impossible for them to make a baby that has genes from both of them. All they want is sex without responsibilities. Go for it. But it isn't right. If someone tried to gas up their car by sticking the pump up the muffler it would be a disaster. This is very similar.

Sukov		02-Jun-2005 18:32
Official "marriage", which amounts to government recognition with benefits, is not based just on two people loving each other. Even if two women have a very strong love, this does not mean their relationship performs exactly the same social function of a married man and woman. The family unit at it's best includes a mother and father - this is uniquely beneficial to society. Although two women can parent children, it is still not the same since it subtracts a father.

Coleen Perilloux Landry		02-Jun-2005 14:27
These two models are very beautiful.

Guest		02-Jun-2005 10:51
What's all the fuss about. Very pleasant photos. Biblical! lol - Guest... go back to your life of socially engineered bondage.

Guest		02-Jun-2005 08:54
Henrik, these are absolutely beautiful. Two people of any gender should be allowed to marry...they love just like anyone else. It is very interesting reading people's comments. Personally, I don't believe the Bible should be used as a reason to not allow to people to marry - I think that just comes from ignorance and fear. Love between two people, no matter who, should be celebrated. Thanks for showing a lovely couple.

Guest From Planet Mars		02-Jun-2005 01:23
Very exotic. Man, I wish I was doing the photographing and more. I haven't never seen anything like this in our world.

Eldar Kadymov		02-Jun-2005 00:44
I think beautiful women should be doing whatever they want ! Guys...? NO !

Jan		01-Jun-2005 14:41
Love is love , no matter what .

Thomas Gehlhaus		01-Jun-2005 06:25
Hi Henrik, really nich portraits. The question about gay couples getting married is not easy to answer. I do not have anything against it ant the couple in your pictures look natural. But what if both girls had chosen beautiful wedding gowns. That would probably have looked a lot less natural. Anyway, the pictures are beautiful and I wish Line & Sarah all the best!

Michele Rodgers		01-Jun-2005 03:24
Fun photos. And definately two adults should be allowed to marry. It is about time in my opinion. It two adults are lucky enough to find each other and fall in love then they should be supported in that love by everyone. Too many folks judge. Congratulations to this young couple and all the best to them.

Guest		01-Jun-2005 02:53
i am so dispointed i chexed back 2day hoping to see some rilly kewl lesbo humpa-hump rubby-rub hot lesbo sex axtion and there'z still nuthin BOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING!!!

snootydog		01-Jun-2005 02:30
These are beautiful photos and you've managed to capture the emotion very well. I see no reason why two people who love each other shouldn't be allowed to marry. Love is love -- who cares what the sexual orientation is. Too many people stick their noses into places they don't belong. Nice work here Henrik.

Guest		31-May-2005 19:38
Marriage is wrong, regardless of being homosexual and or heterosexual. :) Who cares what sex they are, it will most likely end in divorce anyways. :) I like the picks and the ladies are very pretty.

Dytiscus		31-May-2005 15:31
I see nothing wrong in this, eventually the world will realize this. As for the Bible .... it's a great work of fiction.

oliver		31-May-2005 14:09
The photos are very well taken. If two people choice to devote themselves to each otther in civil ceremony; same sex or oppsite sex; it is none of the government business to tell them they can't.

Sukov		31-May-2005 04:59
To Adam: "marriage" in this context is more about government recognition and rewarding of an institution because of it's social value. Of course, at least in America, gays are already free to be in love and commit themselves to each other - don't need official government approval to do that.

Guest		31-May-2005 03:53
Two people in love making a commitment to each other? Seems like the idea behind marriage to me. I'm of the opinion that the debate is what is curious. I can't imagine any reason to debate it at all!

Guest		31-May-2005 03:33
these pix would be much kewler if there wuz hot nekkid lesbo sex-axtion!

Henrik S.		31-May-2005 03:21
Too Guest... No shame on you for not being you self... Can't using your comment too anything when you don't stand forward with your name... Don't hide... But don't get mee started with the bible, there are soo many mistakes if you ever read it right... Who did Amam and Eva's children, get children with??? If you can't do it better than that, then don't do it... Right now we actually have a preast, working in a church in Denmark, that have said, that he does not believe in Good... And why should anyone on this planet judge other, simply by a book, that no one can testify is reel... The most importend thing in this scary world, must be love... But I guess that the Guest don't have any love left for others in his/her heart... And that is simply stupid... Get your own word, and don't put any lines from the bible here... I don't care what the bible says, I want too now what people says, and you got my name, so put out your name also... Yours sincerly Henrik

Lori		31-May-2005 01:13
Biblical answers only mean something to those who believe in the bible. I respect all religions and wish that right wing christians could resist the urge to simply quote from the bible every time a choice is presented with which they do not agree. They seem to be able to find great meaning in obscure passages yet have trouble remembering the simplest of commandments- "Thou shalt not judge..." The institiution of marriage is not negatively affected by homosexual marriages in my opinion. Quite the opposite. The more people who can manage to form a family in this crazy world we live in the better. It is the disconnection and destruction of families that is tearing our societies apart. I'd like us all to encourage any family unit, however small or unlike our own. That's two more people in the world who have someone else to live for, laugh with, grow old with and love.

Guest		30-May-2005 21:48
You ask the question "Let me know what you think" I posted a Biblical answer to your invitation and you delete it? So you are only going to post those that support your liberal one sided view. Your gutless and using this gallery only to support your ego. Shame on you.

Sukov		30-May-2005 20:16
I think asking why they "should not" is the wrong question. The burden of proof is on those who wish to redefine long standing institutions - so why should their relationship officially be qualified and rewarded as a "marriage" when it is not the same? I don't think we can really draw answers to that simply from looking at photographs, no matter how nicely they might be done. Official recognition and rewarding of "marriage" is important to society as it encourages the fundamental building block of a mother/father environment for developing the next generation.

Jaime Serrano		30-May-2005 19:08
Nice gallery, lovely pictures...and with social contents. Congratulations!!!.

Guest		30-May-2005 18:05
Beautiful ladies, and Nice Gallery!

Ana Carloto O'Shea		29-May-2005 20:47
You are right. Why shoudn't they??

Bob Townsend		28-May-2005 17:50
Lovely pictures. You captured the feelings these two beautiful young ladies have for each other perfectly. Very well done. ::voted The debate rages on in the States as well and with the current Conservative political climate, it is not a very pretty debate. The argument against homosexual couples is that is that to allow them to marry cheapens the institute of marriage. What they conveniently overlook is that they dissolve their own marriages by the millions. Tell me that doesn't cheapen the institute of marriage.

Guest		28-May-2005 12:20
I think you've captured the closeness between the girls well. Nice Gallery. I can't see why not, either, btw.

Guest		28-May-2005 10:34
Vry nice gallery, I believe you've captured the feeling you were after in this series. As for marriage, I'm not all that keen on the institution myself but it should be anyones right to take the plunge. Best of luck to the happy couple.

Guest		28-May-2005 06:51
Beautiful ladies, and well taken photographs. I support the right of people to marry whomever they wish. No one should stand in the way of two or more adults in deciding whom they should marry. More comments for you in a note to your guest book, Henrik. Ellsworth I voted for this gallery.

click on thumbnails for full image

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment