photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment
Miljenko Devcic | profile | all galleries >> tech >> Lens reviews and tests >> Sigma 150-500mm DG OS vs Sigma 50-500mm EX DG tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

Sigma 150-500mm DG OS vs Sigma 50-500mm EX DG

Duel1.jpg
Duel1.jpg		 Duel2.jpg
Duel2.jpg		 Duel3.jpg
Duel3.jpg		 Duel4.jpg
Duel4.jpg
Compare150mm.jpg
Compare150mm.jpg		 Compare300mm.jpg
Compare300mm.jpg		 Compare400mm.jpg
Compare400mm.jpg		 Compare500mm.jpg
Compare500mm.jpg
Vrabac.jpg
Vrabac.jpg		 Vrabica.jpg
Vrabica.jpg

comment | share
Miljenko Devcic26-May-2010 20:43
Had both, 150-500 works better for me opticaly (not to mention OS). Sharp right from wide open f-stops. Bigma has to be stopped down 2/3 to 1 f-stop in order to get top notch performance. It has something to do with shortened zoom range. Handling wise, no big difference; both are heavy but on the upper edge of comfort when handholding for extended periods.
Guest 02-May-2010 08:37
Nice comparasion shot for Sigma lens. Which one is your final choice ?
I'm so compulsive to get one, especially after Sigma announce Bigma ith OS, but still undecided.
Which one is better in term of handling beetwen 2 lens above.
Miljenko Devcic13-Feb-2009 07:06
Shots were taken from a tripod with OS turned off. Shortly after the test I've bought a sample of Nikon mount version for my own use and have extensively used it ever since. Generally, shots using OS are slightly less sharp compared to those taken from top notch tripod.
Guest 08-Feb-2009 02:23
Were these comparison shots taken hand held or with a tripod? Also was the OS turned on the 150-500mm?
TY 18-Jun-2008 07:46
Thanks for the review. Agree with your assessment of the two lenses.
click on thumbnails for full image