photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Eighteen: Light and Landscape – combining personal vision with nature’s gifts > Layers of Light, Stoneman Meadow, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004
previous | next
15-OCT-2004

Layers of Light, Stoneman Meadow, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004

Not far from busy Yosemite Village, the heart of Yosemite’s service area for tourism is this broad silent meadow with a river running through it and old trees lining it edges. Shooting before breakfast, I was able to build this image out of the dappled angled sunlight warmly filtering through these old trees. What really caught my eye was how many ways the light speaks in this picture. I can put layers of light to work for me by moving back on to the edge of the meadow to make space for the foreground – my initial layer, which is filled with soft shadows and green and gold grass. These shadows draw eye back into to the second layer -- the beautifully backlit tree that provides the focal point of the image. This back lighting makes its leaves translucent and emphasizes a double diagonal of bare branches that frames the subject tree. The Yosemite controlled burn fires give add a third layer to the image, an area of smoky light. A careful eye will spot “God’s Rays” shining on the background to the right of the subject tree. It adds space and air and infinite depth this photograph. Taken together, these layers speak of the cycles of nature, of the light that brings life to all things, and of this very special place called Yosemite.

Leica Digilux 2
1/200s f/4.8 at 14.9mm iso100 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time15-Oct-2004 08:40:48
MakeLeica
ModelDIGILUX 2
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length14.9 mm
Exposure Time1/200 sec
Aperturef/4.8
ISO Equivalent100
Exposure Bias-1.00
White Balance (10)
Metering Modemulti spot (3)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Programprogram (2)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis29-Apr-2005 19:21
Welcome back to my cyberbook, Hina. I've missed you. Glad you now equate life-giving light with a "Douglism" -- I think you've just coined a new term! And very appropriate for a photographer who often looks first and foremost for light itself as as subject matter. Also glad to hear that you are studying photography, and that you will share some new images with us. I look forward to following your progress in your own galleries.
Guest 29-Apr-2005 19:03
I should say the light that brought life to all things is Douglism!
Wonderful image, I love the admosphere. My favourite times are Dawn, Early morning, sunset and midnight :D

Professor I miss you :), I haven't been taking too many photos cause of the work load, but I think I'll show you some new photos after some study of photography recently :)
Laters
Phil Douglis28-Apr-2005 04:51
You are welcome, Barri. Keep working on applying abstraction, incongruity and human values to your own photos. Eventually, these principles will become intuitive as they are ingrained into your consciousness. The more you practice, the sooner it shall come. And keep on studying my images as well -- interpreting them first on your own, and then comparing your observations to my own. If you have any questions, fire off a comment, and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Thanks, Barri, for participating in my cyberbook on expressive travel photography.
Barri Olson28-Apr-2005 02:36
Hi Phil....
Oh yes I read them!...and your words many times come to me now when I am set to take a photo...(and when I'm editing them) especially those about abstraction to achieve and end, and incongruity...it's just I've got to start to apply them in a better way...and if I keep thinking about things like this...sooner or later I will start to apply these principles...as I think many people have (or will) who have visted your galleries here. I just try and guess what you'll say about your photos to see if I'm interpeting the various forces at play in them...and by doing so make myself more aware. Thanks.
Barri
Phil Douglis27-Apr-2005 20:27
Thanks, Barri, for this observation. I don't care when you read the words -- as long as you read them! This image does express itself in visual terms without needing words. But I add them because this is a teaching site, and I wanted to tell you what I intended, and why I think this picture works as expression. Thanks for making the point about visual language. Expressive images can be just that.
Barri Olson27-Apr-2005 06:38
LOL..and wow....before I scrolled down to read your description....I thought this photo is a study of light...more than a study of trees. You can almost "feel" the light in this one...and how it plays in the air and on the land. Wonderful job Phil. I always never read your descriptions at first just to see how close I can come...and it is amazing since the visual language is as much of a language as the verbal...sometimes more.
Barri
Phil Douglis29-Oct-2004 03:17
You say magical. I say mystical. It's all in the light, Bruce. Light brings these trees and this ground alive. I look for the light, and see what it says, and then organize my image around it.
Guest 29-Oct-2004 01:57
The branches do form a rather magical circle and focal point - as if the trees are whispering "look here". Your use of backlighting is wonderful.
Guest 28-Oct-2004 23:17
Did you hear they found evidence of real human ‘hobbits’. Maybe the ‘living trees’ idea isn't that crazy either ;-)
Phil Douglis28-Oct-2004 20:07
Thanks, Marek for this remarkable analysis. I was fully aware of that backlight cast shadow as a "reflection" of the smaller tree because I built my foreground around it. I am fascinated by your characterization of those branches as "feelers" or pointers. I saw them as diagonal lines that almost created a triangle in the middle of the picture, but now that you call them "feelers" and liken them to the two branches that Jen used to frame her Shanty Town woman (http://www.pbase.com/angeleyes_zyl/image/32209906 ) I see them as pointing AT the tree instead of coming out from it. It amazing how you remembered that small detail that so subtly helped organize Jen's amazing image, and even more amazing how you were able to change the way I now look at my own image! So which way are those feeler branches working? Are they holding us back or pulling us in? For me, they are pulling us in!
Guest 28-Oct-2004 16:12
This also has Douglisms in it. Firstly, the backlight cast shadow complementing the smaller tree, as a ‘reflection’. (Incidentally, Jen uses a similar effect. Another similarity is through the two thicker vein-or feeler-like branches -- they remind me of Jen's Chinese woman in shanty town) Secondly, there is your trick of setting up a second axis at an angle to the apparent viewing plane for the purpose of creating more depth, in this case the larger tree on the right creating a line of ‘perspective‘ with the smaller tree. It's the feeler branches that create the magic here. The trees are alive and will either hold you back, or pull you out into the sunlight.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment