photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Stu | all galleries >> Daily Bowl of Stu >> October 2006 > 796. Solidarity
previous | next
Bute Stu

796. Solidarity

8 October 2006

FujiFilm FinePix S7000Z
1/250s f/7.0 at 31.0mm iso200 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time22-Aug-2004 11:19:21
MakeFujiFilm
ModelFinePix S7000
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length31 mm
Exposure Time1/250 sec
Aperturef/7
ISO Equivalent200
Exposure Bias
White Balance
Metering Modematrix (5)
JPEG Quality
Exposure Programmanual (1)
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
share
suse15-Oct-2006 23:10
I really hope you said this to his/her face!

Re public/private rights - I've been abused twice for taking photos. Once in a public market by an idiot who objected to me taking a picture of him(!) in a 35mm 'landscape' public market shot in the centre of a town. And then a woman in jodpurs who screamed abusively at me for taking a shot of her damn horse on private land, when I thought I had just turned off into a lane. For some reason, she saw fit to shout at me like a servant who had forgotten to take out the washing - when a simple polite sentence would have been enough. I felt like saying to her, that'll be "Dr Servant" to you", if only she'd stopped for breath...
JW14-Oct-2006 20:23
Well done! ~V~
Kees Terberg13-Oct-2006 17:37
Mmmm, issues. I have just encountered an issue which resembles this one but with the States of Jersey. Any photograph of a 'public' building can apparently be used by the states of Jersey to advertise the island with, with or without permission of the author. Only if you have obtained written conscent to use the image from the property owner, you can claim copyright. The most famous case of this is the Eiffel Tower. Nevertheless, I would like to reveal my solidarity with you and the well known photographer. Perhaps you should inform the owner of teh castle that you were merely photographing the landscape. It is rather inconvenient that someone build a castle on it...
Cheryl Hawkins13-Oct-2006 01:40
!!!!! _vote_
Guest 10-Oct-2006 14:55
Well done Stu. Did a google search (kames castle) and found a deleted photo in second place perhaps if we get more searches it will get to number one.
Voted.
Gary Winters10-Oct-2006 05:15
Thank you for doing this. V.
Sharon Rogers09-Oct-2006 20:05
v>
Robin Reid09-Oct-2006 19:07
You are right on and I'm distressed he is feeling compelled to back down. Thanks for doing this Stu.
chrisse09-Oct-2006 17:58
GMV2
chrisse
J. Scott Coile09-Oct-2006 16:03
Just WRONG!!! Well stated Stu.
Dominic Kite09-Oct-2006 12:39
My considerable weight added to the standing too! Voting.
Yvonne08-Oct-2006 23:32
Voted too. Well said Stu!
Herb 08-Oct-2006 22:08
Voted
Ray :)08-Oct-2006 19:49
United we stand.
~v~
Guest 08-Oct-2006 18:51
Voted
Johnny JAG08-Oct-2006 18:27
Well said Stewart, I'm sure we're all solidly behind our Bute correspondent.
James Ross08-Oct-2006 18:09
Well said Stu. Harrassment it is.
Guest 08-Oct-2006 17:40
Here here.
laine8208-Oct-2006 17:16
Good for you " sticking up for your mate, " Stu & for the rights of your country !! I'm voting & hope it receives lots of visits !!
Jim Ross08-Oct-2006 16:57
I think we should have a Pbase meet to take photos of this castle... ;-)
Adalberto Tiburzi08-Oct-2006 16:56
Me too I never declare it...
Vote!
A
Guest 08-Oct-2006 16:40
Make a post card of this shot and send him to him with the url.
Note that if he dont whant is castle take in picture that he have 3 options, 1 destroy it 2 sell it or make a giant fence all around it!
Linda Alstead08-Oct-2006 16:31
well done for speaking out - good for you.....
northstar3708-Oct-2006 16:24
I never, ever say this, but "vote!"
Bob Floyd08-Oct-2006 16:16
This is great! Wish I lived close enough to do this in support of said colleague as well.
Guest 08-Oct-2006 16:09
Make a post card of this shot and send him to him with the url.
Note that if he dont whant is castle take in picture that he have 3 options, 1 destroy it 2 sell it or make a giant fence all around it!