d700300_comparisons Photo Gallery by Larry Miller at pbase.com

photo sharing and upload

picture albums

photo forums

search pictures

popular photos

photography help

login

Larry Miller | profile | all galleries >> Galleries >> d700300_comparisons

tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

St.ThomasWedding2.jpg	St.ThomasWedding1.jpg	Caves5.jpg	Evening sky14-24b.jpg
Evening sky14-24a.jpg	300mD700.jpg	300mD300.jpg	Homework.jpg
Annapolis1.jpg	Triumph.jpg	LivetoRide and Shoot2.jpg	LivetoRide and Shoot.jpg
NightporchISO6400.jpg	NightporchISO3200.jpg	Night2ISO6400.jpg	Night1ISO1600.jpg
24mporch12-24dx.jpg	24mporch-14-24.jpg	24mD300.jpg	24mD700.jpg
70mD300.jpg	70mD700.jpg	200mD300.jpg	200mD700.jpg
PorchD300.jpg	PorchD700.jpg	ErnD300.jpg	ErnD700.jpg
LivRm24mD300.jpg	LivRm24mD700.jpg	ZoeD300.jpg	ZoeD700.jpg

comment |

Larry Miller		07-Aug-2008 02:33
Ed, I don't disagree that there isn't much difference except the obvious wider frame of the D700. The difference comes out in low light situations where the extremely good high ISO performance of the D700 comes out. The ideal situation is to have both cameras and use each in the situations where they have an advantage. Both of these camera are excellent and no one should feel bad about having either (or both ;-))

Ed		02-Aug-2008 01:17
There doesn't seem to be much difference between the pictures that you have taken with the D300 and the D700. And, that goes along with what I have been saying. The D300 can take excellent pictures...so how much better than excellent is the D700. Given certain lighting conditions...better...but, I'm not paying $3000.00 for a D700, when I can get two D300's, with essentially the same electronics, for the same price and change.

click on thumbnails for full image