photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Linda A | all galleries >> Galleries >> walking in my shoes - 2006 diary > 4th July 2006 - NOT mine, honest!
previous | next
04-JUL-2006

4th July 2006 - NOT mine, honest!

OK – I know that this will be ‘beyond the pale’ for some…..indeed if these were mine (which they’re not), I’d never have photographed them for pbase. In fact, this shot is perfect demonstration of a number of things. I like to think I ‘push the boundaries’ in my PAD. On this occasion, I am proud to report that I have shoved a couple quite hard. Firstly the subject matter – I’ll bet that, for once, this subject has NOT appeared as anyone else’s PAD. Secondly, to photograph such a subject with a lensbaby – I doubt that the lensbaby has EVER been used to photograph this subject before. So, there are two ways that I’m striking out today. My photo of a toilet roll was one of my first big 'successes' in my first year of PAD and this is the most vulgar shot since I reckon!

Right, now onto my story!

If you’re a regular, you’ll know of the horrors lurking in the bathroom of this house….and no, I don’t mean either me or DM naked in the bath, I mean all the other stuff. (Bare bottoms allowed – that, m’lud is the case for the prosecution!!!!!!!!)

Last night, after taking my shot, I noticed a pile of unidentified objects piled up on the floor of said ‘room of horrors’. It turned out that they were things that the builders had retrieved from the bottom of the airing cupboard when it was dismantled. There were some pretty gruesome objects, including some of ‘Brentford Nylons’ (a nasty shop selling brushed nylon flowery sheets in the 1970s) finest bedding. Strangely there was a pearly plastic seahorse and a bathmat that had clearly seen better days.

Under the pile though, was this ‘piece de resistance’ – a packet of ‘granny sannies’ – that had been carefully placed under the pile of stuff so as not to cause embarrassment to either builder or ‘lady of the house’. The trouble is THEY’RE NOT MINE.

I know, I know, the lady doth protest too much but in this case, it’s true. They’re really not mine. In fact, I dread to think how long they’ve been there because Mad Maureen was well-past the menopause when she moved here so they are the belongings of some long ago inhabitant, who is probably past the menopause herself now and no longer needs them, even if I was planning to forward them, which I’m not!

Don’t you just hate it when it’s this way around. Most of the time, I find myself wishing the floor would open up and swallow me for things I’ve done or dropped (like the occasion when my petticoat fell down when I was running for a bus in Kensington High Street so I stepped out of it and carried on running). It’s pretty rare for it to be the other way around.

So, I’m faced with a dilemma – do I make it known THEY’RE NOT MINE and embarrass me and the builders again or do I let them think I’d ever wear such things???? I dunno yet.

When I was talking to someone (don’t jump to conclusions about who, I discuss my PADs with quite a few folks) earlier today about whether or not I’d got the guts to take this shot for my PAD (boom boom, a PAD of a pad), I was told of another of these – a condom packet in the parents’ bed…..that REALLY got there in a bundle of dirty washing, not through abuse of said facility by offspring!!!! I guess, on balance, I’d rather have this one than that one.

As for whether this is tasteless and vulgar, let's face it, there has been a lot worse in the meta gallery.....and no, I don't mean all you folks who are trying to do the PAD challenge, before anyone jumps down my throat!

Last year my nose was in a special place - for which I thank Jeanne deeply!!!

Canon EOS 10D
1/30s iso100 hide exif
Full EXIF Info
Date/Time04-Jul-2006 18:55:22
MakeCanon
ModelEOS 10D
Flash UsedNo
Focal Length
Exposure Time1/30 sec
Aperture
ISO Equivalent100
Exposure Bias0.50
White Balance (-1)
Metering Modeaverage (1)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Program
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto
share
Ray :)04-Jul-2007 22:01
If they weren't yours, they must have been Tena's.

And yes, we had Brentford Nylons sheets too and remember my mum talking about how she got a static shock with them. Watch out pop-pickers!
Gail Davison08-Jul-2006 19:55
I just knew there would be a great story to this shot. hahaha.
Guest 08-Jul-2006 17:50
Don't tell the builders they're not yours - wait till you've got the painters in!
*groan*
Guest 05-Jul-2006 16:58
Linda if they are really really old you could always pop into the local museum and ask what period they are from............. sorry! I couldn't resist.
Teresa 05-Jul-2006 16:54
Maybe a bladder control problem? LOL
Michael Todd Thorpe04-Jul-2006 23:39
LOL!!!
Eric Hewis04-Jul-2006 22:56
Somebody else remembers Alan Freeman advertising Brentford Nylons.
I knew somebody who had BN brushed nylon sheets, apparently if you moved about too much in bed you got a static electric shock.
(Unless you were using...)
Sharon Rogers04-Jul-2006 22:24
Love the softness - suits the subject. (Sorry - still chuckling here over the petticoat story :-o hehe)
northstar3704-Jul-2006 21:50
Brentford Nylons? Not arf!
Bill Miller04-Jul-2006 18:58
I am sure they have other uses - insulation in the walls???
Nicki Thurgar04-Jul-2006 18:47
LOL, I believe you, really! Very softly & tastefully photographed granny sannies!