15 March: Dirty Running Shoes by Sheena Woodhead

Sheena Woodhead | all galleries >> Galleries >> ...and so to 2013 > 15 March: Dirty Running Shoes


15-MAR-2013	Sheena Woodhead

15 March: Dirty Running Shoes

Why do they usually come in white!
I've just worked out I've had these 5 years - not that I've been running in them all the time during those 5 years - just on and off.
However, if I am to take this running seriously they do really need replacing and guess what?
They are about the same price as replacing the two front tyres on my car! Hmmm...

Sony Alpha Nex-5 ,Sony 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Zoom Lens (SEL1855)
1/100s f/13.0 at 55.0mm iso200 hide exif

Full EXIF Info
Date/Time	15-Mar-2013 19:25:57
Make	Sony
Model	NEX-5
Flash Used	No
Focal Length	55 mm
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
Aperture	f/13
ISO Equivalent	200
Exposure Bias
White Balance
Metering Mode
JPEG Quality
Exposure Program
Focus Distance

other sizes: small medium original auto

previous | next

All images copyright Sheena Woodhead unless otherwise stated

comment |

Bill Miller		17-Mar-2013 08:35
That's progress. They replace leather with a nylon mesh that lets the water in and charge you for the priviledge :)

Colin Storey		16-Mar-2013 19:47
They look ok to me, save the money for something else, great details.

Martin Lamoon		16-Mar-2013 19:42
Thats expensive! Look forward to a pristine shot of the new ones. v

Brian Samuel		16-Mar-2013 18:44
They look sparkling to me. I'm no runner so I'd stick with the tyres and travel in comfort.

SRW		16-Mar-2013 02:30
I'm just impressed that you go running...! Anything more than a sedate amble, and I'm struggling, nowadays.... Lovely detail... (and I've seen worse...).

Johnny JAG		15-Mar-2013 22:49
Were they white? More like shades of grey.

Linda Alstead		15-Mar-2013 22:20
hmmmm - I agree!

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment