photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Thirty Two: On Safari -- expressing the essence of nature > Riverscape, South Luangwa National Park, Zambia, 2006
previous | next
06-JAN-2006

Riverscape, South Luangwa National Park, Zambia, 2006

Spectacular cloud formations are a photographic benefit of Zambia's wet season. I made this image in the late afternoon, exposing for the cloud and letting the Luangwa River recede into darkness. Safaris offer more than wildlife – unique environments are involved as well, and images such as this can help give a safari its sense of place. I used Photoshop’s “Shadow/Highlight” control to restore a bit of detail in the river, while keeping the delicate colors in the sky intact. The tradeoff, of course, is a noisy sky. But “electronic noise,” as some pixel-peepers would have us believe, is not always a drawback. In this case, it adds a subtle impressionistic texture that enhances the expressive mood and meaning of this picture. The noise helps it become an image filled with power and beauty of nature itself, reminiscent of 19th Century paintings of New York’s Hudson River Valley.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30
1/640s f/8.0 at 61.1mm iso80 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis02-Feb-2006 21:52
I always appreciate it when my viewers liken my photographs to paintings. A painting is a step away from reality. It is a personal impression of a subject, rather than a description. By processing this image as I did in Photoshop, I was able to increase its impressionistic qualities, and that is why you say it looks like a painting. Thanks, Mo.
monique jansen02-Feb-2006 09:14
Just looking at your photos again, and as soon as I came up on this one, I said to myself: painting, it really looks like a painting...then I read your own comments to the photo
Phil Douglis26-Jan-2006 06:29
I like your view of this image, John. Watercolors are delicate and imprecise. If I have achieved a look like that in this photograph, I will be satisfied.
John Reed 26-Jan-2006 04:18
It could pass as a watercolor! Very nice evening color effects.
Phil Douglis25-Jan-2006 18:08
You do a wonderful job of it, too, Alister.
alibenn25-Jan-2006 07:17
Absolutely Phil, there is no right or wrong...My gear may be very advanced, but I try to not let the technology get in the way of my expression....I learnt that from you obviously!!
Phil Douglis25-Jan-2006 04:42
I agree once more, Alister. The more knowledge we have, and the more technical options at our disposal to exercise that knowledge, the more options we can have available to us in terms of expression. Some choose to limit those options. For example, I don't use a DSLR, a flash, a tripod, or complex photoshop procedures to make my images. I use a relative simple yet advanced digicam, and make my images as spontaneously as I can with as little technical help as possible. It's just the way I choose to work. I don't even focus or expose manually anymore. I am not lazy -- I am just prefer to concentrate as hard as I can on the idea, the content, the message, not the form. You choose to take another route to reach the same goal: expression. You use top of the line equipment and cutting edge post processing techniques that serve you well. As you say, and as you show in your stunning rice terrace imagery, you use your gear to its full potential. It obviously gives you great satisfaction to work in your way, just as I find great joy to work in mine. That is the great thing about expressive photography. As artists we are all free to choose our own tools and methods and goals and work in our own way.
alibenn25-Jan-2006 00:58
A camera or Photoshop are just tools at the end of the day...As you demonstrate, you can take excellent images with a Point and Shoot, but there are situations where it's limitations will force you into a compromise or limit you to abstration....The equipment I use gives me more choices, but at the end of the day, it is our eye, and the message we intend to express that is the key. In my recent landscape gallery on the Rice Terraces of Southern China:http://www.pbase.com/alibenn/hani_rice_terraces
I tried to convey the scenes as best I could using the gear to it's full potential...
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 20:29
Thanks, Alister, for this info. I appreciate this contribution, because it will offer my readers knowledge that I could never give them. In my work, I don't do extensive processing in Photoshop, using blended layers etc., any more than I would use tripods or state of the art professional equipment to make my images. I am a teacher, and make images to teach expression, not to demonstrate technical process or prowess. I certainly appreciate what you are doing with your own imagery -- you have extensive knowledge of, and enjoy technical precision and all of its possibilities, and you make images that certainly express ideas with this knowledge. On the other hand, I prefer to keep things very simple, and speak in my own voice, primarily to help my viewers appreciate the principles of expression. I use a digicam and I use photoshop as minimally as I can. I don't teach technical photography -- for me the tools are a means to an end. But I have great respect for those who have the knowledge, patience, and aptitude for that kind of thing.
alibenn24-Jan-2006 11:27
I've been working with blended images quite extensively lately...With having the river in shadow, we have implied depth, but the image appears a little flat...The limited range of light lassitude that sensors/film are capable of capturing limits the exposures we have to play with..

I would have taken three frames, exposing @ zero and the +/- 2 stops..then blended them...

Galen Rowell strove to achieve on film as accurately as possible what he saw in nature...he used graduated Neutral density filters...with the arrival of powerful computer software, the same effect has been achieved....a wonderful scene none-the-less...
Phil Douglis24-Jan-2006 07:04
Coming from a master of the landscape form, this is high praise indeed. I wanted to salute the wet season's spectacular skies, and link them to the Luangwa, which flows out of the great Zambesi. I don't know how you might have done it, but I am sure it would have been every bit as expressive as this.
alibenn24-Jan-2006 06:47
Yes, wet season skies...the best...this works...I'm sure from a pure landscape I would go about it in a different way, but I like this very much as is...
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment