photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Eighteen: Light and Landscape – combining personal vision with nature’s gifts > A Second Look, Dawn Over Half Dome, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004
previous | next
15-OCT-2004

A Second Look, Dawn Over Half Dome, Yosemite National Park, California, 2004

Within a matter of only a few minutes, the light show that nature had put on for us in the previous image had changed in color, form and intensity. I made this follow-up image about eight minutes later, just as dawn was about to become day, by changing both my vantage point and the focal length of my lens. I am still photographing light here as my subject matter, but as I moved my camera position, I noticed that I could create a rhythmically repeating relationship between clouds, mountains, trees and leaves that would tie these natural elements more closely together as both form and content. The clouds, including the intensely colored orange mass, seem to flow into the saddle just to the left of Half Dome. The tree line below the saddle echoes that same flow. I moved the camera in order to pull a branch of Oak leaves down from the upper right towards the ball of fire in that saddle. Using a 24mm wideangle lens, I am composing this landscape as a series of “pointers,” leading to Half Dome from both left and the right, as well from as above. There is a sense of depth here from layer to layer – beginning with the leaves, then the trees, then the mountains, and finally those marvelous clouds. Everything leads the eye to the “cauldron of fire” swirling in the saddle of Half Dome. That’s where all the energy in this image comes from. This landscape is about that energy, as expressed by its light, color and form.

Canon PowerShot G6
1/25s f/8.0 at 7.2mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis29-Oct-2004 00:49
Thank you, Celia, for your criticism of this picture. I strongly disagree with your reasoning for suggesting that I drop this image from my presentation because of its perceived "imperfections." My goal is not to have the "strongest" possible gallery. It is, rather, to produce the best teaching gallery I can. I was fully aware that this shot is similar in subject and somewhat similar in content to the first image. However it teaches us much about how to approach the same subject with different optics at a different moment from a different vantage point and tell an entire different story, even if it is not as strong a story as the first picture. You criticize the job the oak leaves are doing, but admit that they give a feeling of depth and act as pointers. In fact that "stray bunch of leaves" at upper left is there because it precisely echoes the slope of the mountain it overhangs. You criticize the so-called "gap" I left between the leaves, but you have overlooked the fact that I may have left this area open to draw the clouds up and through that very gap. Which was, in fact, exactly why I did it. The only "weakness" I see in this image, Celia, is the fact that it is not as dramatic a picture as the one that precedes it. But if it teaches people about the difference that a few moments of light can make in an image, or about how a different lens and a different vantage point can profoundly change perspective, or if it can show them how to draw the eye through various levels of an image to add the illusion of depth, such an image as this is certainly worth including in this gallery.

This may not be "perfect" picture, but its imperfections are minor compared to its values as a teaching exercise. And that, Celia, is sole reason for including any picture in these galleries. To take these images out of that context and critique them in a vacuum, does a disservice to both the image and the gallery itself.

I will concede, however, that the tiny stray object you noticed on the left and edge is a cropping error, and it will soon be remedied.
Cecilia Lim 28-Oct-2004 18:56
I feel that your gallery would have been stronger if you had ommitted this image because it expresses essentially the same idea about "fire" blazing through the sky as in your first image, except that this is in a different colour. But I do acknowledge that you are trying to make a point about how quickly colour and lighting changes in nature. The bowl where we see the most intense orange colour is flanked by treelines radiating up and outwards from it and this does accentuate the idea of energy bursting from this fireball. This idea again is not dissimilar to your first image that I already critiqued. However I am not a great fan of the job the oak leaves are doing. They do give us a sense of depth and "point" to the bowl, but the stray bunch of leaves on the upper left seems out of place and is distracting. One thing isolation does is draw attention to it, and that is exactly what is happening here, and I don't think this bunch of leaves has anything important to say - certainly not more than anything else in the picture. Hence this attention is not justified. If the gap between the two bunches of leaves were filled with more foliage and created a "line" that accentuated the angle of the treeline and flaring clouds, then it would have made an important contribution. There is also another dark triangular stray object sticking into the left frame above the treeline that is distracting and should have been cropped out. This image has weaknesses that your first image doesn't.

Things in nature are not always perfect for our photographic needs. We either need to work around them and look for a better view or just force yourself to be content with an imperfect picture. From an editing standpoint, since this image is a repeated idea, I personally feel it is best to omit it. Every other image in your gallery is strong and different. Why dilute it with a weak image and used idea?
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment