photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Fourteen: Expressing the meaning of buildings and structures > Fogbound Forbidden City, Beijing, China, 2004
previous | next
19-JUN-2004

Fogbound Forbidden City, Beijing, China, 2004


The key to taking pictures of buildings and structures is simplification. I try to find a single important aspect of a building and somehow emphasize it photographically. The most important complex of historical buildings in China, the Forbidden City is a walled collection of gates, palaces and gardens that covers 180 acres of space. Twenty-four Chinese emperors and their retinues of maids, eunuchs and concubines roamed its 10,000 rooms between 1421 and 1911. It is impossible to tell the whole story in one picture – there simply is too much to say about such a stupendous historical, architectural, and artistic site as this. For this image, I concentrated on a single, simple idea – scale. The Forbidden City is big, and I wanted to embrace it all yet still not show it all. I had to find a way to grasp it, yet abstract it, implying its scale but not describing it. I visited the Forbidden City twice. On my first visit, with an organized tour, I explored the inside – hall-by-hall, object-by-object. On my second visit, I returned by myself, but never went inside. Instead, I climbed Coal Hill, which stands just behind the Forbidden City within Jingshan Park, by far the best spot to appreciate the sheer scale of the palace complex. Nature had stepped in by adding fog to abstract the scene, allowing me to photographically imply, rather than actually describe, the nature of the Forbidden City. The complex is designed as a linear series of huge gates, courtyards, halls and palaces. Using a 245mm telephoto conversion lens on my digital camera, I was able to flatten perspective, zoom over the trees in the foreground, and pull the great structures closer together as they recede into the fog. The closer you look at this photo, the more you’ll see. The fog simplifies the image, yet there is still fascinating detail visible. Note the tiny figures entering the gate at the bottom – they tell us how large the structure is. A small bird wheels in the sky overhead – capturing it was not a matter of luck. Digital imaging is free – there were many birds flying about, and I shot this scene twenty or thirty times until I was able to place one in the right spot.

Canon PowerShot G5
1/800s f/4.0 at 14.4mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis30-Jun-2005 05:29
Anchoring refers to placing a prominent object at the bottom of the frame to give a sense of stability to the foreground and imply depth by pulling the eye into the frame. In this image, the anchor, as Benchang points out, would be that row of dark trees. They draw us into the row of palaces that gradually disappear into the mist. Thanks for the question, d10nysus.
Guest 30-Jun-2005 03:29
Phil:
What does anchoring means? What role does it plays in the composition? Thnx
Phil Douglis05-Apr-2005 05:13
Philism? Is this a new term, coined by Benchang, to imply that anchoring a picture at the bottom with a prominent foreground object is part and parcel of my style? My friend Marek Warno, who often comments on my pictures would, no doubt, call it "Douglistic." He has also noted that my images often deal with subjects of "epic" proportion. I guess this image would qualify on all counts, and I thank you for coining this new term to refer to my style. I gladly accept this anchor as a "Philism," even if I did not invent the technique, but have merely borrowed it.
Benchang Tang 05-Apr-2005 01:43
The anchoring with the tree tops work well and is Philism!
Phil Douglis27-Feb-2005 03:12
Good point, Dandan. I had not thought of that connection. The Forbidden City is, and always has been, a symbol of authority, which generally is the antithesis of freedom.
Guest 31-Jan-2005 16:29
The bird symbolizes the freedom, which was the one thing missing in the Forbidden city
Phil Douglis09-Nov-2004 04:49
Birds are always good, Yanan, provide I can get them in the right place at the right time. On the other hand, I've had some very unpleasant experience with birds in my travels. More than once, I've had to clean their droppings off my lens. But when you spend a lot of time aiming at the sky, that kind of thing is bound to happen.
YNW09-Nov-2004 04:08
What a good bird!!!!!
Phil Douglis16-Jul-2004 19:56
The fog of history, indeed. You got my message here and expand upon it as well. History absorbs us, whether we want to be absorbed or not. All of us are part of the long march of history, and that was very much an unstated premise behind this concept. On one hand, that little group of people entering the Forbidden City, tells us just how big it all is. On the other hand, in entering this historic place, they are entering the past. Just as they, too, will someday be part of the past. I like your metaphor. The "Fog of History" would be a good title for this picture. As for that bird, no commissions. I knew there would a bird in the sky -- there had to be. They were all over the place. It was simply a question of "where?" I got my answer by making twenty or thirty versions of this image. One of them had the bird in the right spot.
Tim May16-Jul-2004 19:24
Another of your travel into images - What I like here is the crowd of people being absorbed into the centered front gate and lost in the fog of history. (Did you commission that bird to fly over?)
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment