photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty Nine: The Layered Image – accumulating meaning > Lasso, Wickenburg, Arizona, 2009
previous | next
15-APR-2009

Lasso, Wickenburg, Arizona, 2009

Wickenburg, only 45 miles outside of Phoenix, was founded as a gold mining town during the civil war, and eventually became the Dude Ranch capitol of the United States. Many of its original commercial buildings still stand, but as in many western towns, they have been gentrified to attract the tourist trade. I walked around the town for an hour and found this single image, which expressed the essence of the place for me. A painting of a stylized cowboy in action fills an entire blank wall on the side of a souvenir shop. Recognizing its potential as my fifth and final subject layer, I walked a block further, passing along the side of a church with elegant western landscaping. I turned and framed this landscaping in varying degrees of focus: a soft Yucca in the first layer, a rounded hedge as a second layer, and a small cactus as the third layer. The high hedge, which makes up my fourth layer, abstracts much of the cowboy. Only his head, arm, and lasso, painted in fiery red colors, can be seen. It was enough to encompass the essence of 21st century Wickenburg.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1
1/640s f/5.6 at 200.0mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis23-Apr-2009 19:45
Thank you, Chris -- the whole image is really based on abstraction. We can only see the the cowboy's head, arm, and lasso, but the rest is up to the imagination of the viewer to fill in, and as you see from the comments, it is doing just that. I controlled the amount of cowboy we see by my camera position and framing.
Chris Sofopoulos23-Apr-2009 15:27
I like the way you abstracted the theme here Phil.
You have a very good eye!
Phil Douglis22-Apr-2009 19:38
"Well seen" is one of those phrases that is used to express a very simple truth: in photography, we must learn to see instead of look. Seeing involves some form of understanding. Looking does not. Thanks, Mo, for appreciating the difference.
monique jansen22-Apr-2009 08:24
well seen!
Phil Douglis21-Apr-2009 22:45
Yes, Sofia -- there is no gold left in the mines of the Old West. They discovered even more wealth in the pocket of tourists.
Guest 21-Apr-2009 20:56
Very great pov, now he has cacti to catch :) Is there no gold left?
Phil Douglis21-Apr-2009 20:18
Thanks, Carol, for amplifying the point I was trying to make in response to John's observation. You are right -- as photographers, we look for a response from our viewers. John, you, and Kal have all responded to this image in different ways, which is exactly what we would hope that an expressive photograph should do. I am glad you see the cowboy as lassoing the cactus, which does strike an incongruously amusing note.
Phil Douglis21-Apr-2009 20:12
Thanks, Kal, for putting the viewer into this image. If we were hiding that close to the big soft Yucca at the right hand side of the frame, that's just the way we would see it -- out of focus. So here we are, hiding behind those plants, with a cowboy trying to lasso us. Our imaginations can tell the rest of the story.
Carol E Sandgren21-Apr-2009 20:11
The dude with the lasso suggests to me that he's lasso-ing the manicured, domesticated landscaping, which somehow is comical to me. I do not find the image disquieting at all, but if it did, I'd think that would work for you, the photographer who is evoking a response from the image. The hot colored lasso-ing dude against the cool very green hedge and even the cactus plant is pleasing to the eyes and further conveys a feeling.
Phil Douglis21-Apr-2009 20:08
Thanks, John, for your observation. People read images differently, and I can see how you might find this image, which reads from right to left, instead of left to right, to be more difficult to read than the flipped version of my picture that you created. I flipped it myself, and when I look at the two versions side by side, they seem to progress through the layers equally well (probably because I am left handed myself). They both flow from softness to sharpness and from green to red. Only the direction of that flow differs. This was the only way I could make the image -- if I were to flip it after the fact, I would alter the facts of the subject, making a right handed cowboy into a left handed cowboy and creating a fictional perspective. This is fine in art, but not fine in travel photography, where we should respect the integrity of the subject matter. Thanks for your thoughts, John -- they help me teach.
John Lamb21-Apr-2009 19:44
Phil, I find this image disquieting and difficult to read. The strong colours in the upper left-hand quadrant keep pulling my eye there but the out-of-fous right hand side of the picture leaves me with a feeling of unease. I took the liberty of downloading it and flipping it horizontally. In that orientation I find it easier to read and more satisfying.

I have enjoyed the rest of this series. Regards John
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment