|bob reynolds | profile | all galleries >> A Journey of Awakening - The Spiritual Gatekeepers >> 2012 Olympic Games Opening Ceremony - Occult Symbolism (Images)||tree view | thumbnails | slideshow|
July 29, 2012
This is a follow-up to the first article regarding
occult symbolism in the Olympics. The first article provides the background for
what is discussed below:
See any resemblance to Freemasons and Masonic Altars?
More Masonic imagery
A reference to the river Thames, a serpent or a scene depicting the Pillars of Hercules?
The Pillars of Hercules are sometimes described as a "gateway" or "portal". In Dante's Inferno, when describing the circles of hell, Dante mentions Ulysses and his voyage past the Pillars of Hercules. Ulysses justifies endangering his sailors by citing the opportunity to gain knowledge of the unknown. After five months of navigation in the ocean, Ulysses locates Purgatory but encounters a storm that ends up sinking his ship.
The "Twin Pillars" have great occult significance. They are regularly seen
in ritualistic ceremonies involving the Freemasons and Illuminati.
During the ceremony there was some verse spoken from the Shakespearean play "The Tempest". There are many different intertwining themes in the play, but the basic storyline is this --- Prospero, the exiled Duke of Milan, and his daughter Miranda are "cast away" to a remote island. Prospero plots to "restore" Miranda to her "rightful place" by using "illusion and skilful manipulation"
Cruella de Vil
Cruella de Vil's country house was nicknamed "Hell Hall"
Cruella de Vil is the iconic villain from the novel "The Hundred and One Dalmatians". In the story, Cruella kidnaps Dalmatian puppies and uses them for their fur. Cruella prefers the fur of puppies because the fur of older dogs is very coarse and doesn't sell as well in the fashion industry as the fine soft fur of puppies.
Cruella de Vil's name is a play on the words "cruel" and "devil". Her country house was nicknamed "Hell Hall". In some translations, Cruella De Vil is also known as "Cruella De Mon" (Cruel Demon). In the French translation of Disney's animated movie she is referred as "Cruella D'Enfer" (Cruella of Hell or from Hell).
Interestingly, the character of Cruella de Vil often comes to life (manifests) in various forms of modern entertainment such as Lady Gaga in the image above. Notice the black and white hair (another reference to the concept of duality).
Multiple Mary Poppins float down over children in hospital beds.
The original story of Mary Poppins was published back in 1934 by Pamela L. Travers. The Mary Poppins character portrayed by Travers is actually quite a bit different than what is typically seen in the modern versions of the story today. The context in which we see Mary Poppins appear here makes one wonder which version of the story we are looking at?
The original story makes references to many esoteric themes. For example, there is one scene in the book that involves a starling and the newborn Annabelle. In this scene, the bird asks Annabelle where she came from and Annabelle replies:
"I am earth and air and fire and water...I come from the Dark where all things have their beginnings. I come from the sea and its tides, I come from the sky and its stars...I remembered all I had been and I thought of all I shall be."
The passage above actually alludes to a number of different esoteric concepts. However, it is included here mainly for the reference to reincarnation which fits in with the "new birth" image above and the Phoenix symbolism below.
There is another rather curious scene in the book involving a zoo. In this scene, the animals run the zoo and all the people are in cages (perhaps
a premonition or vision of modern society?). The king of the animals is a huge hooded snake that Mary Poppins calls "cousin."
Demons, witches, nurses, children and hospital beds....rather
odd and somewhat
disturbing imagery to celebrate the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games.
Lord Voldemort is a fictional character from the Harry Potter series of books. It is said that no witch or wizard dares to speak his name. Rather than being named directly, he is instead referred to as "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" or the "Dark Lord".
Lord Voldemort has an obsession with blood purity (as do the real-world Elite class). His goal was to rid the wizarding world of Muggle (non-magical heritage) and to conquer both worlds (Muggle and Wizarding) in order to achieve pure-blood dominance.
There are a number of instances in the Harry Potter books were individuals are taken over or possessed by Voldemort, including:
In the "Philosoper's Stone", it is revealed that Voldemort is the one who possessed Professor Quirrell:
"See what I have become?" the face said. "Mere shadow and vapour...I have form only when I can share another's body...but there have always been those wiling to let me into their hearts and minds..."
This is an interesting passage when viewed in relation to the imagery that was contained in the opening ceremony and also that which is commonly seen in modern society and in the mainstream media via TV, movies, video games, books, news, etc. It seems that we are being incrementally conditioned, little by little, to willingly accept the darkness and let it into our hearts and minds.
In the "Goblet of Fire", Voldemort explains how he possessed Professor Quirrell and the animals:
"I could possess the bodies of others...I sometimes inhabited animals - snakes, of course, being my preference - but I was little better off inside them than as pure spirit, for their bodies were ill-adapted to perform magic...and my possession of them shortened their lives; none of them lasted long...'Then, four years ago, the means for my return seemed assured. A wizard...young, foolish, and gullible wandered across my path in the forest I had made my home. He was easy to bend to my will. I took possession of his body, to supervise him closely as he carried out my orders."
Is the passage above referring to something that is confined to only fiction, religion and ancient folklore? It's a question one might ponder while watching the evening news.
The fact that the "Dark Lord" was the single largest prop that appeared in the Opening Ceremony was not a coincidence. It was designed to capture our attention and hold it there. From an occult (ritualistic) point of reference, Lord Voldemort was used as a conduit to capture and channel the energy of over a billion people watching the opening ceremonies and then transfer that energy somewhere else (perhaps to the new "child" seen in the image above?).
The first image (directly above) is a ritual at Bohemian Grove in Northern, California. Members are seen here gathering around a large bonfire and giving praise and worship to a giant owl. Owls are predators that are known for their incredible eyesight and their ability to see into the darkness. The other four images are from the 2012 Olympic Games Opening Ceremony. See any similarities?
Here we have a group of men standing around a molten flaming pit with steam and smoke rising from it, hammering away. It almost looks as if they are trying to break through to something below, rather than build something above. Eventually rings of fire are forged out of the molten fiery pit and then they rise above the crowd. It seemed like there were quite a few references to burning pits and rings of fire in the opening ceremonies.
The Phoenix is a mystical bird which is said to have a life span of 500 years. At its death, it prepares its own funeral pyre and out of its ashes rises a new Phoenix. The Phoenix is generally regarded as representing immortality and resurrection. The Phoenix is a significant symbol in many occult orders.
Birds are often seen as symbols of change.
As human beings, we often have a tendency to dismiss that which is uncomfortable to us. It is a built-in defense mechanism that the establishment often uses to keep their agendas hidden from us. Their agendas move forward because we have become willing participants in the cover-up by hiding the information from ourselves.
The most difficult place to search for change is from within. However, it is from here that true change always takes root, both on an individual level and on a macro level. I suppose that we could band together and imprison all the current external "perpetrators", but what would that really accomplish? What would the next set of "leaders" look like?
The establishment has been quite busy lately with their hammers and chisels trying to shape humanity into some kind of monstrosity. They would like us to believe that we lack the desire and power to change the face of the sculpture that they are creating for us and that we lack the necessary skills to rewrite that which they have tried to etch in stone. However, they cannot decide the fate of the entire human race. They can only control those that choose to take the trip with them. We as individuals, have the ultimate power to determine our own path and our own destination in life.
Humanity, in fact, has a secret weapon that the ruling elite does not want us to know about. It is so powerful, that if everyone decided to use it in a conscious manner tomorrow, the game would be over. That secret weapon is freewill. Freewill is both greatest gift, and the greatest crutch that has ever been bestowed upon humanity.
It seems like almost every mechanism of the control grid has been specifically designed and set up for one purpose -- to limit the use of conscious freewill. If the system can effectively condition people to reject the idea of freewill and self-empowerment, and embrace the idea that change can only come from an external source, then our destiny becomes preordained. With each new election, the system offers us the newest and greatest "leader" that promises to fix everything for us. What has changed recently? Nothing This is a very dangerous (downward sloping) curve that we are riding.
I happen to believe that a certain amount of skepticism is healthy. But it's only healthy if we examine all the facts and details for ourselves and then form an educated opinion based on complete information. I understand that some of the subject matter in the last two segments is probably difficult to ponder. However, the only way that we can truly disconnect from the system is if we become knowledgeable enough to recognize the danger signs when they are in front of us and then act intelligently and accordingly by choosing to become non-participants in the broken or harmful areas of the system. On the other hand, if we choose to simply write it all off as some "conspiracy theory", then we are in essence acting as our own prison guards and will most likely go on (unknowingly) supporting the very system which seeks to control us.
The true power is in the people, not in the system.
Peace to all
For more information, please see part 1:
A complete index of all segments in this series
can be found here:
The most recent posts in this series
can be found here: