Lens reviews and tests Photo Gallery by Miljenko Devcic at pbase.com

Lens reviews and tests

In this gallery you will find my lens tests done mostly using Nikon D70, D2X, D200, D300, D7000 and D7100. If not stated differently, all pics shot at ISO200 & ISO100, RAW, daylight, no sharpening other than the one incorporated into RAW converter. Mayority of tests performed using single lens sample, so the results might not be a good representative of that particular lens. When results deviate significantly from expected, lens is retested and if satisfactory results are still not achieved, another sample is obtained for testing.

pages 1 2 3 ALL

:: How I'm doing resolution measurements ::	:: long_tele_lens_comparison ::	Bokeh_test.jpg	CHEAP_vs_EXPENSIVE.jpg
Four_tele_lenses.jpg	:: How to perform sharpening of raw, unsharpened D70 pics ::	Canon70-200vsNikon_Sigma70-200.jpg	Monopod_tripod_test.jpg
:: 50mm f1.8 vs 50mm f1.4 Nikkors ::	:: Pictures of lenses ::	:: Nikkor 18-70DX vs Sigma 18-50 f2.8 DC ::	:: Controlled, comparative, repetitive & meaningful bokeh tests ::
:: My Bigma experience ::	:: 70_300mm_lens_battle ::	:: sigma150 ::	:: Kenko vs Sigma TCs ::
:: Wide to ultrawide lenses ::	:: Canon EOS 350DX vs Nikon D70 ::	:: Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 F-S DX vs Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 DC ::	:: Nikkor 35mm f/2.0 AF-D ::
:: Sigma 30mm f1.4 vs Nikkor 35mm f2.0 ::	:: d70vs5d ::	:: Sigma 24-60 & 28-70 ::	:: Nikkor 35-70mm f2.8 AF-D ::
:: Sigma 17-70 vs Sigma 18-50 ::	:: Sigma 17-70 vs Nikkor 35-70 ::	:: sigma10_20 ::	:: Nikon Fieldscope ED82 ::
:: Sigma 50-150 mm f2.8 EX DC APO HSM ::	:: Sigma 150-500mm DG OS vs Sigma 50-500mm EX DG ::	:: Sigma 50 f1.4 vs Nikkor 50 f1.4 ::	:: 35mm Lenses Shootout ::

pages 1 2 3 ALL

comment |

Guest		24-Feb-2012 14:46
Fantastic gallery, very helpful for those who are looking for lens options. Thank you for sharing. Marcelo

Guest		02-Jan-2007 15:01
Ciao Miljenko, several months after you kindly answered to me on this page (24-Mar-2006 13:23)and privately by email, i wish to thank you again for that valuable advice :-) http://www.pbase.com/nemeo2006/image/72305014 Best regards Mario

Miljenko Devcic		24-Dec-2006 23:43
Hi Akhan, yes it's a bit strange lineup/marketing decision of producing two similar range & quality lenses but with very different pricing. Anyway, if you manage to get a good copy, Sigma 17-70 is one heluva lens to have at very modest price. Talking of focal length, yes, it's a huge difference in viewing angle between 24-85 and 17-70. You probably wan't miss that upper 15 mm, but 17 vs 24 mm is one HUGE difference. Of course, general tip is valid as always: if you can, try before you buy! And, yes, rely on dependable dealer with good return policy.

Akhan A.		23-Dec-2006 00:19
Miljenko, I've really enjoyed your lens reviews, especially those that compare the Sigma 18-50 EX and Sigma 17-70. I am still a little confused as to the marketing of these lenses... I currently own a Canon EF 24-85 (on a EOS 10D body), and am thinking of getting a Sigma 17-70. Would that be a significant improvement in the Wide-Angle aspect of the lens? If I understand correctly, my current lens is 24x1.6-85x1.6 (approx.) 35-135? So would the Sigma be 17-70 or 17x1.6-70x1.6 (approx.) 28-105 on my digital body? Thank you so much! Kind Regards, Akhan A.

Kerry Pierce		24-Oct-2006 19:05
Thanks for all the hard work you've done on these tests, Miljenko! This is a very nice resource for folks to use. I'm hoping to see you test the sigma 50-150 f/2.8 EX at some point in the near future.

Miljenko Devcic		04-Oct-2006 08:58
Zeljko, hvala na pozdravu i pismu. S obzirom na specificnost problema, odgovorit cu direktno, e-mailom.

Miljenko Devcic		19-Apr-2006 08:01
Hi Paul, I hope you did receive your d200 copy and started shooting with your new lenses. Although 18-200 is a nice allrouder lens, it's not a miracle soluton for all situations. It could be a nice addition to a serious lens line-up, but not the substitution for good primes or zooms.

Paul		15-Apr-2006 22:34
Thanks Miljenko for your very detailed reviews. Had been considering new kit and with your help went out yesterday and purchased Nikon D200, Sigma 17-70 and 50-500, First impressions, impressive. Bigma seems ideal lens for airshows and birds (amongst other things). At moment D200 in short supply in UK and waiting list for 18-200 Nikon lens ridiculous. Nikon UK say they expect to start having stock in few weeks but I know several individual shops have back orders for 30+ each so they are talking about 5-6 months before any become available for new orders.

Paul		11-Apr-2006 19:49
Thanks Miljenko for your very detailed reviews. Had been considering new kit and with your help went out yesterday and purchased Nikon D200, Sigma 17-70 and 50-500, First impressions, impressive. Bigma seems ideal lens for airshows and birds (amongst other things). At moment D200 in short supply in UK and waiting list for 18-200 Nikon lens ridiculous. Nikon UK say they expect to start having stock in few weeks but I know several individual shops have back orders for 30+ each so they are talking about 5-6 months before any become available for new orders.

Miljenko Devcic		06-Apr-2006 08:20
Nikkor 85mm f1.8 is in production for so long and it is notoriously known for great results so I felt there is no much (new) to say about it. Besides, I have mine always in the bag, using it a lot, expecialy for portraits. Here are just a few:http://www.pbase.com/miljenko/image/50415619 ,http://www.pbase.com/miljenko/image/51205877 ,http://www.pbase.com/miljenko/image/51206089

Guest		05-Apr-2006 14:44
Milkjenko, I've really enjoyed your lens tests and have found them very helpful in making decisions about what to purchase. I've decided to get the Sigma 30mm/1.4 to go along with my 18-200 VR, and have now started to think about a longer prime. I noticed that you have a Nikon 85mm 1.8d in your bokeh tests of the boy and field of flowers, but that you haven't tested it more extensively. If you have any interest in doing it, I and probably many others would be very appreciative. Thanks for your efforts!

Miljenko Devcic		24-Mar-2006 13:23
Saluti, Mario, I had 18-70 for a while (really good copy), then switched to Sigma 18-50 and finaly I settled for 17-70. 18-70 was not fast enough, while 18-50 had yellow cast and I was missing that extra 20 mm. Now I'm fully satisfied with 17-70; it focuses precisely (but not extremely fast) on both D70 and D200, gives neutral, saturated and sharp pics all the way from f2.8. My recommendation for your first lens!

Mario		26-Feb-2006 15:23
Buonasera Miljenko i reviewed carefully your tests involving Sigma 17-70 and Nikkor 18-70, but still looking forward to you comparing directly these two lenses. I decided to make my first step into digital getting a D70 body (probably used) and, to begin, a 18-70 or 17-70. Are there focusing issues when Sigma is used on a D70 or D70s? And now, the main question... :-) regardless of price, which of the two lenses would you buy for yourself? Thanks a lot for your advice, and congratulations again for the great job on this site. Best greetings from Napoli

click on thumbnails for full image

Type your message and click Add Comment

It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest. Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help	private comment