photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
knyp | profile | all galleries >> Canon PowerShot Pro1 tree view | thumbnails | slideshow

Canon PowerShot Pro1

All pics come directly from the camera via Photoshop Album 1 - except iso-shots via Photoshop CS(compression-quality: 10) and rotate 0.5 CCW and a little cropping.
previous pagepages 1 2 ALL next page
IMG_0008.JPG
IMG_0008.JPG		 IMG_0004.JPG
IMG_0004.JPG		 IMG_0013.JPG
IMG_0013.JPG		 IMG_0015.JPG
IMG_0015.JPG
IMG_0016.JPG
IMG_0016.JPG		 IMG_0017.JPG
IMG_0017.JPG		 IMG_0019.JPG
IMG_0019.JPG		 IMG_0021.JPG
IMG_0021.JPG
IMG_0035.JPG
IMG_0035.JPG		 IMG_0046.JPG
IMG_0046.JPG		 IMG_0051.JPG
IMG_0051.JPG		 iso50.jpg
iso50.jpg
previous pagepages 1 2 ALL next page

post a comment
Mike Hunt 19-Mar-2004 12:39
Not bad at all... I do see some PF/CA, but not so much as to worry about it. One suggestion: On the night pictures, if you had used a smaller aperture and a slower shutter speed, you could have accomplished two things... the PF/CA would have been reduced or eliminated, and you would have gotten a very pleasing blurred effect on the ripples in the water, creating a very smooth color gradient in the light reflections.
jagoex 07-Mar-2004 22:55
Very nice. I am actually pleasantly surprised.

I would complain about purple fringing, but even the human eye is guilty of CA, so there is no reason to. ;)
A Stock Shooter 05-Mar-2004 21:01
Commenting on sharpness while viewing jpegs on a 72 dpi LCD or CRT is pointless. What do the prints look like? Also, did the shooter use a tripod for all the shots? I'm guessing no. The shots of the watch and Sony digicam probably were done by setting the camera down next to the subjects and these both appear pretty sharp, but I 'd want to print them from a raw to tiff conversion to really check. Does a tripod (or IS) increase sharpness at 1/250? Yes, and I know this from experience.

This camera may be the perfect travel light camera for someone with Canon flashes, as long as you shoot at 50 or 100 ISO and can keep it steady. Slik and Manfrotto both have some pretty nice little tripods specifically for digicams. Wow, just like Velvia in the old days.

As for purple fringing, my G3 does it a bit. Hasn't kept several images taken with it from being published. I like little cameras that I can take anywhere, when I just don't want to drag along the big stuff, or when I don't want to look like a pro.
Guest 03-Mar-2004 22:56
Thanks for posting these pics. I like most of the shots, especially given my expectations. Others seem to be quick to find fault.
ukexpat 03-Mar-2004 21:11
Before we pass judgement, why don't we ask what settings were used for these images. I suspect that they were JPEGs on default settings, which may explain some of the apparent problems.

BTW, CA can be dealt with easily by PS actions that are widely available for free on the internet.
Guest 03-Mar-2004 20:41
not that greta a camera; too much CA, purple fringies
guest 03-Mar-2004 20:34
The camera is not free of CA; plenty of purple fringing. A bit more than what I would like to see. Sharpness is OK, but not stellar. I think these 8MP sensors are really not that great.
click on thumbnails for full image