photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Thirty Three: Using light and color to define and contrast textures > The life of a palm, Phoenix, Arizona, 2006
previous | next
25-AUG-2006

The life of a palm, Phoenix, Arizona, 2006

I had a Mexican Fan Palm planted in my own backyard when I moved to Phoenix 12 years ago. It has already grown higher than my house, and perhaps someday, long after I’ve moved on, it will top 100 feet. Its thick trunk is ringed with the remnants of palm fronds that have long since been pruned away. I thought these fanciful stubs, fringed in wispy hairs, would make a more expressive photograph than the overall tree itself. And what better challenge for a brand new camera’s very first assignment than a close-up of nature in my own, all-too-familiar backyard? I had just taken delivery of my 10MP Panasonic Lumix FZ-50, and wanted to see how it would render texture, detail and color. I was delighted with the resulting image, and look forward to making thousands of new images with the FZ-50’s remarkable Leica zoom lens. I made this photograph deep in the shade of the palm tree’s own huge fronds. I set my white balance, as usual, on “cloudy” -- warming the color as I prefer. Using my spot-metering mode, I exposed on the brightest part of the wood to bring out the maximum detail in the stubs and the fragile hairs that surround them. These stubs are like an old, well-used skin that still clings to a body -- an interwoven patchwork of frond stubs reminding us of both life and death. As with us all, a tree begins to die the day it is born, and this is how it displays the reminders that mark its passage through life.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50
1/250s f/4.5 at 14.7mm iso100 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis28-Jan-2007 01:44
Making things flow together harmoniously is essentially what defines aesthetics, Suwanee. I am delighted you are moved by the aesthetics of this image. The lighting is actually very subtle -- I made this backyard image in the shade at mid-day, using light reflecting off of nearby houses. Yes, I abstracted the subject, but you have to give a lot of the credit here to nature for making these pruned palm fronds so facinating at close range.
Guest 27-Jan-2007 14:10
This is such a great image capturing light, shapes, detail, and texture. Everything just flow together so harmoniously. Lighting is just brilliant, great capture!
Phil Douglis07-Sep-2006 06:36
Thanks, Kathy, for these words. I admire your own abstractions, and it made my day to have you come to my galleries for the first time and leave these thoughts on my one of my own. You are a young photographer, full of passion and promise. Your images work because they consistently seek to reach the imagination of your viewers. That is what I am trying to do here. Thank you for opening your own imagination to this image, Kathy.
Kathy Pedersen07-Sep-2006 02:28
Stunning image, amazing detail and saturatd colors. I love how you see. I am so blown away by this image! You have a beautiful eye! Voted
Phil Douglis06-Sep-2006 19:20
Thanks, Iris, for joining the long list of commentators here -- I appreciate your endorsement of what I was trying to do here, and glad you find it helpful. Looking forward to traveling with you into the Sierras come next month -- you and I will be talking much about things like this along the way, I'm sure.
Iris Maybloom (irislm)06-Sep-2006 16:20
After reading all these comments, Phil, all I can say is ditto, ditto, ditto. Your comments are as expressive as your photography and both are learning experiences for me.
Phil Douglis06-Sep-2006 01:30
Thanks, Yves -- the closer we get to trees, the more fascinating they become. Palms, in particular, are compelling subjects because of their exotic trunks, fronds, and fruits. Thanks so much for seeing the complexity here.
Yves Rubin06-Sep-2006 00:35
Beautiful light with this difficult subject, palms fascinate me!
Phil Douglis05-Sep-2006 20:28
Thank you, Dave, for the comment. As you know, I regard my cameras as tools, and this FZ 50 looks like another in a series of very capable ones for the kind of work I like to do. As you know, color, texture and detail are the building blocks of travel photography, and the quality of the lenses we use are important factors in defining them. And of course, there is always the evocative quality of the light as well. You've led me to such light on your photo tours many times. I look forward to shooting again with you in a few weeks.
Dave Wyman05-Sep-2006 20:15
Phil, I know you have the ability to make awe-inspiring, jaw-dropping photographs with any camera. I also know your new camera will provide you with a sophisticated set of tools, over which you exercise complete mastery. Your goal of defining detail, texture and color with your FZ 30 has been met, and you have done so in a delightfully artistic way.
Phil Douglis03-Sep-2006 18:26
Thanks, Derek -- that is why I selected this subject as a testing ground for my new FZ-50. Can it interpret color and record detail expressively? I wanted to express the richest possible blend of color, detail, and nuance that I could find, and judging from this image, this particular camera renders such a scene beautifully.
Phil Douglis03-Sep-2006 18:21
Thanks, Gary -- as you see, I don't make "test-type" photos. I much prefer to do my testing along with my interpretations. For me, it's "real life" imagery that is most important, so why not see how a camera performs under such circumstances? Thanks for the comment.
Guest 03-Sep-2006 17:05
What A Superb Shot! I Love The Richness Of This Picture! Wonderful Detail and Texture!
Gary Robertshaw03-Sep-2006 05:52
I finally got around to looking in here to see how the FZ50 does with detail, and frankly I expected some lab-type test photo, but what a treat! Educational in more ways than one, very nice photo.
Phil Douglis31-Aug-2006 22:51
Welcome to my cyberbook, Rene. And thanks for coming to this image. It shows us that there is beauty in everything, even in dead palm frond stubs. The colors are warm, the surface tactile, and even the hairs play a part in making this what you say it is. Thank you.
Rene Hales31-Aug-2006 22:39
Warm wonderful textures, warmth and color.--Rene
Phil Douglis31-Aug-2006 17:26
Glad to help you make up your mind, Armando. Keep in mind, however, that a camera must fit the needs and uses of each photographer. You must see something in this image that gives you confidence in the FZ-50's ability fill your own needs. Good luck.
Armando Amaya 31-Aug-2006 14:03
Very nice pictures, you just made my day I was hesitating if I would send my FZ50 back or not. Thanks for your help and nice pictures

Armando (Miami, Fl.)
Phil Douglis31-Aug-2006 00:09
Thanks, Andrew, for coming back to this image again and again. I find myself doing it as well, and each time I do, I notice more stuff going on than before. It began as a very simple image, but it becomes progressively more complex as you study the interlocking relationships of wood, and the amazing detail of the hair, and that rich, vibrant, deep coloration. It's all of what you say it is, and then more so. Such is the complexity of nature, even in the simplest of things.
Guest 30-Aug-2006 22:27
Well, it's exotic for me too - we don't see many Mexican Fan Palms here in Manchester, UK! Notwithstanding all the technical stuff, I just like this shot and keep coming back to it. Not sure why - the colour? the detail and the hairs? the texture? or just the overall feeling.
Phil Douglis29-Aug-2006 23:59
Thanks, Bill -- it is strange to think of something you see every day in your backyard as "exotic" In fact, as I type these very words, I can lift my head to the right, peer out my window and look at this very same tree, and it looks just like an ordinary palm tree to me. Yet when we get very close, everything changes, doesn't it? The ordinary can become the extraordinary by just seeing it as a camera sees it -- in a frame, very close, soft light bouncing off a nearby wall. Thanks for noting that a photograph must be SEEN before it is MADE. And that is what we must do as photographers. See.
De'Carr Studio29-Aug-2006 22:53
So perfectly seen. So very exotic!
Phil Douglis29-Aug-2006 17:28
Thanks, Jen for this comment. It does celebrate both life and death, simultaneously. As for the new camera, you can see its capabilities demonstrated in this image. Since you have used a Panasonic yourself for awhile, you are familiar with the look this sensor brings to its images. And yes, experiment with cloudy white balance. It is like putting a warming filter on your camera. You can get similar effects in Photoshop, but cloudy white balance gives it to you out of the camera.
Phil Douglis29-Aug-2006 17:23
Thanks, Larry, for this comment. I used to shoot with the FZ20, and found it an effective tool for expressing ideas. There are many images in this cyberbook made with that camera. I had equal success with the FZ30, and I am sure the FZ50 will be a useful tool as well. I think the images themselves from these cameras are virtually identical in quality. The added features in the FZ30 and now the FZ50 make things even easier for the photographer, and with each increase in resolution, we get more cropping latitude. I am sure your wife will find the FZ50 to be useful tool as well. It's portability, live preview, waist level shooting, and long lens with image stabilization should complement her DSLR quite effectively.
Jennifer Zhou29-Aug-2006 13:33
The warm color is a celebrate of life or even death here..
I will try to use the cloudy white balance to warm my pictures too, it looks really great!
I love your new camera, it will be a great tool for many pictures to come..
Guest 29-Aug-2006 12:40
Phil, as usual you have proven to me that it's the photographer that makes an image and the camera is only the vehicle to that destination. I'm still a die-hard Panasonic FZ-20 shooter, and despite some of it's shortcomings, I haven't found enough features in the newer models for me to make the switch. My wife is seriously considering the FZ-50 as a more portable alternative to her DSLR kit, and I will be sending her here to see what the '50 can do in the hands of a master. It's a stunning image and a wonderful example of what the new camera can do. Good luck with it on your field shoots...I hope to see many more examples such as this!
Phil Douglis28-Aug-2006 23:56
Thanks, Celia, for your beautiful words, as usual. You are so right. This is a tawny, hairy image. That's what I saw as I looked into my viewfinder. Richly textured, warm brown wood, edged in curly white hairs. Together they build a texture here that strongly affects our senses. We want to touch this exaggerated "bark," just to prove to ourselves that something so exotic can be real Thank you for seeing (and feeling) this aspect of it. And thanks, too, for the good wishes on my new camera. It is off to a memorable start.
Cecilia Lim28-Aug-2006 12:48
So many people have left such wonderful comments here already. What I'd like to add is that your warm treatment of colour here gives this tree much life. The fronds, cut away and discarded may be dead but underneath it is still a tree, very much alive - Its tiny veins of red running through its pinkish-red bark remind me of a human body, alive and still pulsating with blood. You also bring our attention to its hair, which unlike the fuzz on a newborn baby's head, is coarse and thick , implying that tree has seen many years already. This is a very tactile image and I can almost feel the roughness and hardness that this tree has endured in this desert city. And congratulations on having this new camera - If this image is anything to go by, I am sure we will be seeing a lot more fabulous images beautifully crafted with this great new tool by a brilliant photographer behind it!
Phil Douglis27-Aug-2006 19:27
I was hoping that someone would comment on the regional content here. This is a very western image, Ceci. These palms only grow in warmer climes such as Arizona and California. And yes, there is a gnarly symbolic flavor of the old west in these bark-like stubs -- tough, coarse, and rugged. Even the horsehide reference has a nostalgic regional glow to it. Thanks for being so observant.
Guest 27-Aug-2006 07:00
What a gorgeous first image from your new Eye, Phil, so rich in texture and color and movement. Nature seems to know just what to do with the skins of trees, turning these pieces into something that reminds me of horse hide and hair. This is to me a quintessential western abstract, just from the color, the gnarled bits, the shapes and the rugged toughness of this material. A straw bale house would be graced with an enlargement of this image, hanging on an adobe wall. Kudos, Maestro!
Phil Douglis27-Aug-2006 03:56
Thanks, Ai Li, for coming to this image. As for camera functionality, it is important that we understand what kind of tools will work best for our needs. A lot of young photographers make expensive mistakes by asking people (including salesmen) to recommend a "good camera." There is no such thing. Would you shop for a saw or hammer or nail by asking for a good saw, a good hammer or a good nail? Of course not. We have to know what want to build before we would buy the tools to build it. I always try to explain the pros and cons of different kinds of cameras to my students, so that they will be better prepared to buy equipment that works best for them. As for this image, I love your comparison to the human face, (as well as the hands). Henri Cartier Bresson once said that as we age, we get the face we deserve. Yes, wrinkles are a mark of life and living. Just as the creases and notches and grain in this wood expresses the wear and tear of this palm's life, our own stories are written upon our faces and hands.
AL27-Aug-2006 03:23
Very interesting discussion on camera functionality. I must admit I'm totally lost as I'm never good at knowing the technical terms or jargon. Another valuable lesson to be learnt. Back to your picture, I really like its rich texture and detail. Beautiful color gradation and grain as the plant/wood ages gracefully. Reminded me of the facial lines on the old people, each one tells a story. Phil, I'm sure yours too :-)
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 19:44
Thank you, Sue, for commenting on the word "capture" -- I try not to use it myself, because I do not feel that I am catching anything -- I try to create my images, not capture them. In other words, I make pictures. I don't take them. I think it is just a popular phrase that people use almost unconsciously to praise another's person's skill at finding a moment in light, time, and space that expresses an idea effectively. I often think of a picture as a "good shot" -- but then shooting is not exactly what I am trying to do, either. You are right -- good eye, good thought, good concept,
are all more accurate ways of expressing the value of an image. Capture is digital lingo, a cliche usually used without giving it that much thought. And almost all of us have used it at one time or another. I wish it would go away.
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 19:31
And thank you, as well, Lorraine, for telling me how this image makes you feel -- which is really why we make expressive images, isn't it? I wanted the color to warm you emotionally, just as it warmed me. The tree, by the way, still thrives. It just wears its girdle of dead palm frond stubs as a reminder of its past. My Panasonic FZ-50 is an entirely different kind of camera than your Canon DSLR, Lorraine. It has a fixed Leica 35mm-420mm zoom, instead of interchangeable lenses as your DSLR offers. The FZ-50 shows me a live two-dimensional electronic preview of what my picture will look like before I make it, while DSLRs don't show us a live image until after we make it. It has built in image stabilization, as well as a flip-out viewfinder, which allows me to shoot from the waist and not mask myself with the camera. For most travel situations and for web-based display, the FZ-50 is the perfect tool, far lighter and less expensive than any DSLR and its accompanying lenses would be. However its 10 million pixels are fitted on to a smaller sensor than a DSLR, which produces noisy images at high ISOs. That does not bother me, since i don't use high ISOs that often, and I shoot only for web display, which does not show noise as readily as large prints. A DSLR also fires longer and faster bursts, and can focus on fast moving subjects much quicker, and produces far cleaner low light images. We have the weigh the pros and cons of these tools, and pick the ones that best suit our own purposes. If you have any more questions about the FZ-50, you might find the answer on its web page athttp://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/lumix/fz50/index.html
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 18:56
Good point, Kal -- the great architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe once said "God is the Details" And that is pretty much what you say here. Thanks, as always, for cutting through the prose and getting to the core of it.
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 18:52
Thanks, Chris, for enjoying the light and color here. I use a spot meter to base my exposure on the brightest part of the image, in this case, the highlights on the diagonal stub just to the right of center. And I always set my white balance on cloudy when I am shooting outdoors. It gives a similar effect to shooting with a warming filter. It removes that blueish "digital" look that automatic or neutral white balance often produces. Of course, a similar effect could be produced in post-processing, just by adding a touch of yellow and red. I often do that as well, because I love warm colors. It does not mean that it is right or wrong, good or bad. It is just my style.
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 18:47
Photographers spend too much time, Ana, talking about the relative merits of cameras instead of the relative merits of expression. That's because it is easy to talk of pixels, and not as easy to discuss ideas. I have had people write to me and tell me they felt they "wasted" their money on a DLSR with several lenses, when they could have purchased a camera like mine for under $700, because my pictures "looked better" than theirs. I tell then it's not the camera that makes the differences they see. It's the way the camera is used. And so it goes with your Sony. As for this image, the light was mid-day sunlight reflecting off the walls of my house and creating a soft glow on this tree trunk, which is in the deep shade. It was important for me to test the fidelity, variation, and intensity of the color produced by my new camera's sensor, and that is what I was looking for in this exercise, along with the camera's ability to render detail. As you, say it does not look like the throw away photos we usually see as testing exercises. That's because, as long as I was working so hard to test the color rendition, I felt I should take the time to make an expressive image out of it. I worked on this composition, making about ten versions of it to get it down to this. Thank you for your delightful impressions. And yes, I love the new camera as a tool for expression. It fits my needs perfectly.
Sue Roberts26-Aug-2006 16:31
beautiful texture and lighting......i dont know what it means when someone says"good capture" especially if something is easy to "catch"(this isnt going anywhere) so i wont write that......although i know someone will point out that it probably means........"good eye"!(and so they should say it...)
Guest 26-Aug-2006 12:45
Wow, Phil. You must be very pleased with your new camera. Very impressive colour tone and the texture is to die for. The capture itself makes me feel warm when I look at it. The rich tones and surreal looking wispy hairs add identity to a once thriving tree. I would certainly like to try out this FZ-50...L.
Kal Khogali26-Aug-2006 11:31
I like that it is impossible from this image to tell whether this is waste wood, or a live plant...you see it in all it's detail and glory, and that is all that matters
Chris Sofopoulos26-Aug-2006 08:01
Great light and colour Phil. It seems to me that your exposure was perfect! I hope that your new baby will be as good as the other Panasonic you had.
Can you tell me some things about the white balance you used? I haven't experiment with it till now, having it still in the normal -0- setting. What can you achieve with it changing it?
Thanks,
Chris
Ana Carloto O'Shea26-Aug-2006 07:41
All that talk about the noise in images was the reason why I didn't get the FZ20 last year and got the Sony instead :) I can't really complain as I think it's not a bad camera also, though of course, no one really takes you seriously when you shot with a sony...
When I went to make that payed photo session I saw the boy's disbelief when he looked at my camera... Are you shooting me with a Sony?? Of course, when he saw the photos he didn't even remember about the camera that took them :)) Hummm... Sony should sponsor me for doing all this job of trying to make people see its photos seriously not just as Sunday snapshots, because they were taken with a Sony...

About your photo. I love the "close up" compo. It gives it a certain abstract feeling that is quite interesting. But it's the colors that are the imediate eye catcher in this one. The light was perfect for this quind of shot.. was or you made it to be, I don't know, but it's perfect alright. I think it shows that your new camera handles colors beautifully. Not just colours, but details also. Though this seemed like an "exercise" photo by the way you indroduced it to us, I think it's quite a beautiful and rich one.
I am sure you are loving that new camera ;)
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 06:55
I was hoping you would come to this image, Jenene -- it's your kind of image. An intimate view of a plant. But this is dead stuff, and no blooms in sight. But it works as expression, doesn't it? It was at the worst time of day - when I test a camera, I really push hard to see how it works under difficult conditions. I ALWAYS use cloudy white balance outdoors because my style leans towards warmth. And yes, the Panasonic FZ series gives me all I want in a travel camera. A very long image stabilized Leica zoom, a flip out viewfinder for waist level shooting, a full sized camera yet very very light --easily for a 72 year old fellow to carry around all day in one hand. And this image is heartening, because it gives me a good idea of the capabilities of this particular model.
JSWaters26-Aug-2006 05:50
Phil, I understand why you were thrilled with the image. The detail is quite something. I'm surprised with the warmth of the color, allowing for the cloudy white balance setting (which I use almost exclusively) and the deep shade of the palm itself, you're still in Phoenix in August at 1 PM!! I'm not familiar with these cameras, but reading of your fondness for how they fit your style of shooting, I predict you'll be very happy with it. I like seeing this close shot from you - from one who feels very comfortable with the close ups.
Jenene
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 02:28
Thanks, David, for reminiscence. Plants are living things, and it is easy to become attached to them. This tree is just outside of my window. I see it everyday. This was the first time I took a long hard look at it. As for the noise issue, Panasonic did not change the sensor on the FZ-50. It is the same one that was on the FZ-30. Yet it holds an additional two million pixels, so it is even more prone to noise. However Panasonic also introduced a new processing engine, the Venus III, with this model. It drastically reduces the effects of noise. So yes, there is more noise, but we see less of it. So much less, in fact, that Panasonic added ISOs of 800,1600 and 3200 to the FZ-50. I have not shot at those sensitivities, but would not hesitate to do so. The noise reduction feature tends to soften and smooth the images a bit if used aggressively. It is controlled from the Picture Adjustment menu. I have it set on LOW for this image, so its effect is minimal. (There is no noticeable noise to begin with, at ISO 100.) Noise has never been a factor for me. You generally will see noise if you make large prints of images shot at high ISOs on the Panasonics. I don't make prints. I use all my images to teach here on the web, and at 72 dpi resolution, noise, if there is any, would be barely noticeable and certainly not enough to affect meaning. The Noise Police have given the Panny's a bad rap, I feel. People who examine photographs at 100 per cent original size are generally fanatical pixel peepers, most of whom treat photographs as a science instead of an art.
david procter26-Aug-2006 02:13
Its very interesting to measure time via trees and plants. My mother rememers buying/planting plants when my brother and i were born. Theres a rather proud looking cheese plant that continues to thrive thirty two years later in her conservatory minus white fringing about the head. Mt uncle always points out a great beech in his garden that he planted as a boy over fifty years ago.
Warm colour and great texture and detail. I'd be interested to see if panasonic have improved the noisiness at higher ISO sensitivity, if you remember the reason i changed camera those months ago! My girlfriend continues to use the fz-30 and i must confess missing it!
Phil Douglis26-Aug-2006 00:10
Thanks, Josselyne -- I hope this image will be helpful to you.
Josselyne 26-Aug-2006 00:08
Fantastic! Great color, wonderful detail capture.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment