photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Fourteen: Expressing the meaning of buildings and structures > Opium Museum, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 2005
previous | next

Opium Museum, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 2005

The Golden Triangle embraces parts of Burma, Thailand, and Laos that line the Mekong River valley. For centuries, it has grown poppies and traded in opium and later heroin. As an educational venture, Thailand has built a spectacular museum documenting the history of this sordid story. I was not allowed to make any photographs inside. While the building itself was well designed, its architecture and setting were not particularly unique, so there was little reason for me to photograph it on its own merits. I did make one expressive photograph that afternoon, however, just before we left Thailand for Laos. I positioned myself at the end of the museum’s long outdoor walkway, framed by columns, and plants. I did so because of the warm light, and the striking shadows thrown on the end wall by a perforated overhang. I waited for a person to come out, and wanted that person to be anonymous, walking away from us rather than towards us. I wanted that person to be small, to create scale incongruity. The Thai authorities had prevented me from commenting visually on any aspect of the drug problem this building was built to explain. But they could not prevent me from making this shot, which comments on the nature man’s relationship to institutions. A young woman came out the door and began walking rapidly away from me. I felt as if she was somehow trying to escape from the overwhelming institution that surrounds her. This is a building picture on one level, and social comment on another.


other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis06-Aug-2005 18:31
Thanks, Sonia. I love having discussions on any art that relates to photography. And since this gallery is all about expressing the meaning of buildings and structures, architecture plays a significant part in whatever we may express in such images. When that discussion is with a student of architecture, the substance of the discussion here is elevated accordingly. It a joy to have you here, Sonia. Thanks for coming.
Guest 06-Aug-2005 07:50
Yes, I agree that it is sometimes hard to see the preliminary thoughts and intentions from the finished product, oh yes, that's how things work for art and design, I so agree with it! By the way, if the Holocaust Museum was truly a masterpiece, I wouldn't have missed visiting it, hehe - so Phil, I don't think it's your problem that the exterior seem out of context for you. I'm glad to have the discussion with you, Phil, and I'm amazed that you give so much thoughts on architecture!
Phil Douglis06-Aug-2005 06:24
Yes, I saw that, Sonia. I agree with you entirely. So much depends upon the context we bring to a building, or a photograph. I simply felt the Holocaust Museum, which I have seen only in photographs and on TV, seems much more evocative of this tragic era on the inside than it is on the outside. I am aware of the architects intentions as stated on the website, but I can't relate very well to them, possibly because I simply do not have the architectural context to truly appreciate the exterior. It is therefore my problem, not the architects. But that's just the way things work, right?
Guest 06-Aug-2005 05:17
The introduction on the wbesite did mention the architect's intention to arouse the memory of the Holocaust. Quoted from the abstract, "the architecture, by a collection of abstract forms — invented and drawn from memory — refers to the history the Museum addresses." I cannot say whether the architect's "devices" are successful or not but the intention he has, to make reference in history, I think is credible. Like expressive photography, architecture is abstract and requires a context and there're strong ones as well as weak ones.
Phil Douglis30-Jul-2005 23:52
Thanks, Sonia, for making this point. It is true, the interior of the Holocaust museum tells a far more effective story than the exterior, which seems to leave most of the story up to the viewer. It can be seen athttp://www.ushmm.org/museum/a_and_a/ You are an architectural student. What do you think?
Guest 30-Jul-2005 20:36
It is interesting that you are linking this building to the Holocaust Museum in DC, Phil. I missed the chance of visiting that building due to time contrain when I traveled to DC last Christmas. I remember seeing the newly added Tower of Faces to that museum when I did research on buildings that provoke memory :

Sounds like the rest of the building hasn't done its work.

Phil, if you have a chance to visit the Jewish Museum in Berlin by Daniel Libeskind, I would like to hear your take on it. I'm sure you would like to photograph it.
http://architecture.about.com/library/bllibeskind-jewishmuseum.htm
This guy did a couple of Jewish museums, he just finished one in Denmark and is building one in San Francisco.
Phil Douglis30-Jul-2005 07:34
Thanks, Sonia, for adding your voice to this image. Now that the two architectural students among my viewers have left their comments on this photograph, there are no more worlds for it to conquer. I am glad you saw the oxymoronish quality to this situation. Opium Museum almost sounds like the Church of Hell, doesn't it? As for the architects failure to symbolically reveal the essence of this place in his or her design of the building, I wholeheartedly agree. The site was spectacular, and the building was quite functional and very striking. In a way, it reminded me of the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC, another grand building with a tragic story to tell inside of its halls. Neither this building or the Holocaust Museum seems to give any indication of the terrors that lie within. In a way, that thought triggered my approach to this image, which is intended as a social comment. I felt that the woman in this picture seemed to be running away from a threat here. The sheer scale of this structure, and the institution it symbolizes, seems to pursue her down the long passageway.
Guest 30-Jul-2005 06:28
Thanks Phil, for thinking of Likyin and me when you took the picture. I have visited this gallery many times but didn't comment on it because I have been somehow avoiding it. It is really hard for me to not look at the form of the building when I'm visiting one. (Phil, you must be nodding your head by now) But now I'm starting to tour this gallery again and hope to make comments here.

I'm starting with this one because of what Likyin said. I love her description of the building, making the museum a lovely place to hang around. And in this lovely building I found the incongruity. Building an opium museum itself sounds hilarious. Opium resembles evil (although it can also be used as medicine, but from your description Phil, I know the museum is about the evil side of it) and of which should not collaborate with education. It is a nice comparison here with the architecture and the object it hosts.

One more comment : architecture should reveal symbolically what it hosts or the essence of the place where it stands ... I guess in this case, the architect seemed to fail in his/her design. (oops!)
Phil Douglis31-May-2005 04:32
Thanks, Likyin, for bringing the perspective of an architecture student to this image. In fact, I took this image with you and Sonia Mak in mind -- my only two students are also students of architecture. I am pleased that you find this image so peaceful. And I am delighted that you enjoyed viewing it. My friend Mo does not enjoy architecture, so she did not find this image of much interest. Which shows us how important viewer context is when it comes to understanding and appreciating expressive photographs. I am sorry that you do not share the social comment aspect of it with me. Apparently the scale incongruity between the young woman walking away form us and the vast institution that surrounds her does not strike you as intimidating. I would be willing to bet that someone who had a strong fear or dislike of instutions would feel my social comment immediately. Why? Because they would have a context for it. In the end, so much comes down to context, doesn't it? Thanks, Likyin for being the first to comment on this image.
Guest 31-May-2005 03:25
The picture itself is sheer peaceful, Phil. I could hardly find a hint of optium issue from it. In a sense of architecture, I found it very attractive because of the scale (3x6M, I believe), the warm color, and my love of the transparency of corridor. The perforated overhang and its smooth extension with the shadow strengthened the transparency and made it very optimistic, other than with complaints or sorrow. The lady was in a perfect position to let this image fly. BUT, I don't think this sheer peaceful and poetic image could tell any of the social comment you expect.
Phil Douglis01-Mar-2005 00:55
Mo, this is a gallery devoted to expressing ideas about buildings. If you have no particular love for pictures of buildings, why spend your time in this gallery?
monique jansen28-Feb-2005 12:47
I have no particular love for pictures of buildings and this one confirms that to me. I like it fine as a picture with scale, but nope on the architecture part.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment