photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Twenty Three: Stirring emotions through atmosphere and mood. > Foggy Dawn, Phonsavan, Laos, 2005
previous | next
24-JAN-2005

Foggy Dawn, Phonsavan, Laos, 2005

Phonsavan is in the remote province of Xieng Jhoung -- not far from the "Plain of Jars" -- a mysterious and little known historical site deep in rural Laos. I made this image from the deck of our small rustic hotel high on a hill overlooking a valley studded with tombs known as stupas. The textures and colors created by the morning fog caught in the crevices of the valley below convey a mood and atmosphere that is profoundly mystical. There is also a deeply spiritual mood to this photograph, created in part by the presence of all those tiny tombs. Indeed, this scene becomes even more poignant when you learn that this area was one of the most heavily bombed sites on earth during the Vietnam War. (There were still huge bomb craters just outside of our hotel.) The United States Air Force, supporting Laotian Hmong forces in their losing battle against North Vietnam’s army and Pathet Lao forces, pounded the entire area. The tremendous fighting and bombing decimated the population here. The ghosts of 30,000 war casualties are never far away here. With this context in mind, look still once again at this image. Another word comes to mind for both its mood and meaning: haunting.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20
1/125s f/4.0 at 60.7mm iso80 full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis19-May-2006 18:08
Thanks, Kal, for using the word "filter" here. As photographers, we are used to using filters to alter reality and bring a sense of fantasy to an image. But in this case, as in the case of your own similar image athttp://www.pbase.com/shangheye/image/59967068, nature provides its own filter, creating a ephemeral landscape rich in symbolic associations.
Kal Khogali19-May-2006 07:15
Yes, amazing similarities Phil, in a sense the fog creates a fantasy, a filter that makes the scene dream like...almost intangible in it's existence. Rgds, kal
Phil Douglis18-May-2006 19:38
When we can combine tombs with fog, we abstract them, implying mystery and memories. It comes as no surprise to me that you equate this picture to walking civil war battlefields on a misty or foggy day. I have had the same feeling when I visited those battlefields.
JSWaters18-May-2006 06:38
Phil, this image is familiar to me because you used it as a teaching tool in response to one of my images. Until seeing it now, I didn't connect this to the image burned in my memory of walking civil war battelfields in the Southern US.There were no tombstones, but, haunting nonetheless.
Phil Douglis12-Jul-2005 01:18
Thanks, John, for your nice comment. As I've often said, the purpose of expressive photography is to kindle thoughts in the minds and imaginations of our viewers. If this image can do that, I'll be satisfied with it.
Guest 12-Jul-2005 00:56
We don't need to paint, if we can see . . . and if dare to capture the images, they will make us think. Phil, once again you display splendid food for thought. Thank you for sharing.
Best regards,
John Connor
Phil Douglis07-Apr-2005 20:38
I noticed the shaded corners as well and left them there for the very reason you mention, Alister. This is one of my favorite "landscapes" because of the tension created between the soothing misty view and the horrifying reality of what happened down there. This is not a lovely scenic at all. It is a haunting, grim, and deadly scenic view. Brooding uglyness is a good word, and as you say, it not an aesthetic scar. It's a mental scar.
alibenn07-Apr-2005 10:22
Some very interesting comments on this image. At first look, a very easy on the eye image, somewhat reminding me of East African valleys at dawn, the odd Gnu wouldn't look out of place here. But as has been noted, the fog and mist here hide a grim reality, the tombs. As I studied the image, the initial serenity of it, was replaced by a brooding ugliness, not aesthetically, but mentally!! If that makes sense? The upper two thirds are still serene, but the tomb-hill diagonal just rips through the mist, throwing me off guard again and again. You know I am quite a strict technical kind of guy, and I quickly noticed the vignetting at the top corners, which I have to say are distracting, BUT and this is where Phil magic scores again. Rather than being a scar on a lovely scenic, they are improving the grim oppression, by pushing in the corners in a chlaustrophobic manner. A very powerful image. great job..
Phil Douglis16-Mar-2005 01:32
Mist and fog not only sets a mood of their own, Zandra, they are moods in themselves. Mist and fog obscure, hide, and thereby create mystery. They stimulate the imagination, triggering emotion. They are haunting, ephemeral, and ghostly. Mist and fog are also abstractions, depending upon what they hide and what they reveal, and how they do so. I can't blame you for feeling somewhat ill at ease with this image. Those are tombs on that hill at right, and here in this valley, thousands perished during the Vietnam war. The juxtaposition of those soft, graceful curves, almost a figure study of nature, against the haunting mist and fog that embraces them, is quite incongruous. You have asked a question and then answered it. If you believe in ghosts, they would certainly walk these hills. And if you don't, you can view this scene as almost supernatural in its beautiful mystery. Thanks, Zandra for provoking these thoughts with your fascinating comment.
Guest 15-Mar-2005 18:48
Mist has a tendecy of setting amood of its own. In most case it is a mysterious mood. Depending on the overall colour of the enviroment the mood can then swiftly change to haunted or a more fairy tail mood. The composition with it's soft curves of the mountain and difrent layer invites to a realex atmospher, but the cold colour and mist reveals that something is hidden. Something may be lurking around. This make me feel a bit un ease when looking at it. It is the mystique, huanted? perhaps. If the mountians are haunted one must ask, haunted from what. To answer that question you must either belive in ghosts or look in tou yourself.
Phil Douglis05-Mar-2005 00:34
Thanks, Catriona, for this follow up. Glad you learned something important from this exercise. Never reject a picture out of hand for quality or technical reasons. Only reject it for lack of content or meaning. Quality is always secondary to meaning as far as I am concerned. I looked at this shot as it flashed on my LCD and knew that i could enhance it and make something far stronger out of it. I knew this based on previous experience with similar images. I have seen many many images that looked crappy out of the camera just glow with life on my computer screen after a few clicks in Photoshop. I know the capacity of my tools as well, Catriona. The longer I work with Photoshop CS's shadow/highlight tool, the more miraculous it seems to me. It lets you have your cake and eat it too as far as the interplay of light and shadow is concerned.

As for that buzz, i am buzzing every time I look at my images. The instant feedback of digital imaging is the single most important factor in photography as far as I am concerned. When I saw this image appear on the LCD of my FZ 20 , I was thrilled to the very core, because I knew that I could do just about whatever I needed to do to improve it, once I got it into my computer, and worked on it in Photoshop.

Thanks, Catriona for this substantive comment and question. I look forward to many more from you.
Catriona 04-Mar-2005 22:41
Hi Phil

I agree, the word 'manipulation' is prehaps a little harsh - 'enhancement' and 'restoration' are much more appropriate terms as they imply that we bring the best out of the photo - what was already there in the first place. I used the shadow-highlight tool and it was an amazing transformation! I have been using that tool on some of my recent photos and have been very impressed with the results.

Part of being a good photographer is knowing when you have captured a good image. Do you get that sense of excitement (buzz) when you look at the image on your camera? I know many people who would have deleted a photo such as your original from their camera.

Catriona
Phil Douglis04-Mar-2005 18:19
Hi, Catriona,

Thank you for letting me know how much my cyberbook has meant to you. And I am happy you are delighted with your FZ 20. It is a remarkable tool, and this image is an excellent example of what Leica 432mm image stabilized telephoto lens can do for you on a foggy morning with a distant subject.

I will send you an email attachment of the original jpeg so you can see what I was able to do with it in Photoshop. Normally I do not have to a great deal of work in Photoshop. I don't like to even use the word "manipulate" because it implies change. And I would rather not change my images, only enhance them. My general routine is to adjust levels to fine tune exposure, warm up my images a bit with color balance adjustments, increase contrast as needed, touch up the saturation a hair, and perhaps sharpen the image in unsharp mask.

In this case, however, because of the fog, the pinkish coloration of dawn that I saw with my eyes, did not show up in the original jpeg out of the camera. I had to use a more drastic Photoshop tool to rescue it -- the new Shadow/Highlight Control in Photoshop CS. I just clicked once on that control, and this image looked pretty much as you see it here. It restored what I saw with my own eyes.That is not manipulation, Catronia. It is restoration.

i will send you the jpeg and you can play with it. If you have Photoshop CS with the shadow/highlight adjustment tool, you can see it happen for yourself.

As for Australia, no, we have never been there. It is on my long term wish list, however. And I do get there, I would be thrilled to meet you and share a photographic adventure with you. Thanks again for this comment. I am glad you are learning from these galleries and I welcome your comments, questions and critiques.
Catriona 04-Mar-2005 12:48
Phil, I often return to your photo galleries and spend many hours looking at your amazing photos and reading your wonderfull explanations of them. I first came across your site when I was researching digital cameras. I had no hesitation in purchasing the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20 after seeing the quality and depth of your photos. I have been extremely pleased with the camera and enjoy spending endless hours taking many photos and then getting the best out of them with Photoshop. I am interested to know to what extent you manipulate your photos with a program such as Photoshop. For example, did you do anything with this photo to get such as dramatic effect or was it achieved 'in camera'?

I also notice that you have travelled far but have no photos of Australia (or none that I have found here!). If you do happen to visit, I would be more than happy to be your guide and tag along on a photo shoot!

Catriona
Phil Douglis28-Feb-2005 03:55
Dandan, it took my breath away just to be present at such a time as this. Nature abstracts its own, the image can only interpret it, not reproduce it. As for the haunting, all battlefields are haunted. War is a terrible thing, and those who die because of them have every right to remind the living of their folly.
Guest 27-Feb-2005 15:10
This is breathtakingly beautiful! Are you sure this isn’t a painting, Phil? :)
The layer after layer of mountains, the tree lines, the mysterious fog, I don’t want to think that it’s haunting; I would prefer that it’s the most peaceful place where those innocent souls are resting…
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment