photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Phil Douglis | all galleries >> Galleries >> Gallery Sixteen: Story-telling street photography > The Sentry and the Girl, Lisbon, Portugal 2004
previous | next
04-SEP-2004

The Sentry and the Girl, Lisbon, Portugal 2004

Children are more likely subjects for expressive images than most adults because of their uninhibited body language. I had been photographing a stern Lisbon sentry, saber rigidly held over his right shoulder and getting little more than a picture of a stern sentry. I may have been producing an effective environmental portrait, but it was certainly not street photography. A young girl who most likely lived in the neighborhood walked over to watch me work. She was more interested watching me move around with my camera than she was in looking at the sentry, who for her was already “part of the furniture.” I immediately saw a street photograph in my head – the contrasts between the rigidity of military behavior and the spontaneous informality of a child. I moved well away from the sentry, looked down into my flipped up LCD display at waist level, and turned my lens on the girl, while facing well away from her. She had no idea what I was shooting. She crossed her legs, touched her fingers together and began to softly sing to herself. I was able to make this picture, contrasting the leg positions, arm positions, costumes, size, age, race, gender, and attitudes of these two people. Because the girl is closer to the camera, she is much larger than the guard, and free to do whatever she wants. The sentry, on the other hand, must stand at the door to his box, a slave to duty.

Canon PowerShot G5
1/80s f/4.0 at 23.0mm full exif

other sizes: small medium large original auto
share
Phil Douglis05-Jul-2005 03:16
Liz, I suggest to my students using DSLRs such yours that they consider also carrying a compact digitalcamera with a flip out, rotating viewfinder to use when they must work unobtrusively. They also make handy backups.
Guest 05-Jul-2005 03:00
Ahh, thank you for explaining! I have a Nikon D70 (usually with a 300mm lens) but if I'm to get an additional camera in the future I will definitely consider one with a viewfinder such as that - I can see it's usefulness! Thanks again for the quick and thorough response, and for posting the photos in genneral - not only are they interesting to look at, I've learned a lot from your explanations. :)
--Liz
Phil Douglis03-Jul-2005 23:58
Thanks, Liz, for your comment on this image. Right angle viewing is easy if you have a digital camera that has a flip out, rotating LCD. Canon's G series has used these rotating viewfinders, and I used a G5 for this shot. (I now use the G6 -- you can see a photo of its rotating LCD athttp://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong6/page2.asp ) As you can see, holding the camera at waist level, it is easy to look down into this viewer while at right angles to the subject. She did not realize the camera was pointed at her. Waist level shooting, even straight on, is much less intimidating that masking your face with the camera. I use the G6 for all of my wideangle work (with its 24mm wideangle converter attached) as well. (For telephoto shots, I carry the Panasonic FZ20. It does not have a flip-out rotating viewfinder. I wish it did. Digital SLRS don't have flip out LCD viewfinders either -- you must look through the lens itself.)
Guest 03-Jul-2005 23:22
I'm an aspiring photographer and have learned a lot by browsing through your galleries. Thank you so much for taking the time to not only post your wonderful photos, but to provide detailed explanations for each. :)

For this photo, you said you turned away from the girl and flipped up your LCD display. I can't visualize this in my mind, though it sounds like a useful trick. Is it a position specific to your type of camera, or can it be done with most?

Thanks,
Liz
Phil Douglis18-Nov-2004 03:19
Thanks, Jen, for caring enough to ask such questions. You made me work yesterday!
Phil
Jennifer Zhou18-Nov-2004 03:06
Yes, I agree with you, the geometric composition ties everything together and everything can echo each other! Very important tip! Thanks for your answer Phil. :)

Jen
Phil Douglis17-Nov-2004 18:09
What a wonderful question, Jen. You are working my brain today! Here is how the geometric context affects meaning. As we have discussed before, form, as aesthetic value by itself, does not mean very much. But when form helps organize an image so that it can express its ideas more fluently, it can certainly affect meaning. So Henri's geometric composition -- the context for the image, or the recognition of an order as he called it -- means nothing in itself. It is only aesthetic form.

Yet it does affect the meaning of the picture because our subconscious minds process the repeating geometric patterns that echo each other, the tensions they create, and the way they can move the eye from place to place within the image. This sense of order ties everything together so that the incongruent juxtapositions can express their ideas more clearly than if they were placed in a mass of confusing, accidental details.

Do you see what I am getting at here, Jen? Do you agree?
Jennifer Zhou17-Nov-2004 07:05
Phil, I have never notice the role of the geometric context in the pictures before.
But the question in my mind is: how this geometry exactly help the meaning of the pictures? Does Henri mean the geometric composition is the perfect way to present the picture? And everything come to be in order? It surely has aesthetics value but how much it helps the meaning?

Jen
Phil Douglis15-Nov-2004 17:33
Thank you, Jen, for another one of your fascinating observations. I not surprised that you were drawn to this image, because I see in it many parallels to your own approach to street photography. Here it is the world of childhood, with its trance-like innocence being played against the rigid, formal, world of the sentry. She free to do what she wants. He is not. In your own image at:http://www.pbase.com/angeleyes_zyl/image/32277037, a child plays in her own world. She is oblivious to the adult world around her. Her parents converse, while a stranger talks to another person in another place on her cell phone. Your image and my image both are heavily structured by geometry as well. My geometry is made up of patterned cobblestones and the zebra-patterned sentry box. Your image is ordered by the geometric patterns of street tiles, benches, and planters. The children in each of these pictures do their own little dances within these structures. They are free to do what they want because they are children. Someday their lives will not be as free -- they, too, will have to eventually conform to a structured life. Both your picture and my picture cause us to wonder what is in the minds of each of these children. And in each case, as you say, the body language of these children becomes a mirror of their very souls.
Jennifer Zhou15-Nov-2004 16:10
Phil,
I can see how much this flipped up LCD helps you to picture like this. Nobody awared of you and your camera, you are an observer here and didn't have any impact on their behaviours, now they are perfectly themselves. And that is what makes this picture so charming.

And this is a moment benefited greatly by the two people's body language----body language can be the mirror of the soul.

A good picture asks questions and this one really does. I want to know what makes this girl almost into a trance? ----suggesting something happening outside the picture. What's going on in that sentry's mind? He is standing so still, is his mind not moving either?

I like this picture, it is simple but very efficient.

Jen
Phil Douglis26-Sep-2004 21:28
I am flattered by your comment, Pedro. It means a lot to me when people who actually live in the place that I photograph, enjoy my images.
Guest 26-Sep-2004 16:24
Very nice picture ! I love it.
Type your message and click Add Comment
It is best to login or register first but you may post as a guest.
Enter an optional name and contact email address. Name
Name Email
help private comment