Just got this lens and am pretty much addicted to it!
It is successfully replacing my 35mm f/2 in daily "let's go for a walk" usage, alongside a 90mm Tamron. I really can't stand to use a zoom if I don't have to.
My preliminary judgement is that this is a lens whose strengths are sharpness wide-open (no mean feat for such a bright lens) and an ease of use that it's well-implmented AF-S brings. I'm actually a little disappointed with the bokeh. It's certainly better than the 35mm f/2, but still falls apart a bit when there is too much to distract in the background. That said, the shallow depth of field can be used to give a nice effect if you are careful what you allow in the background. I like the rounded aparture blades, too, much better than the old bee-hive effect!
Another problem is the distortion. This lens, if you are at all interested in architectural photography, will just have to be digitally corrected. Yes, it isn't a'pro-grade' lens as such- But I am sure it is capable of some pro-grade results if carefully used.
Thanks for your visit and kind comments, glad I helped you there! I find it a very usable lens, with some fantastic qualities. It is always sharp with incredible auto-focus, plus the bokeh can be very nice.
Definitely one for photographers more than vacationers and without breaking the bank! Nikon has finally remembered that there are lots of keen amatures/prosumers out there and released a lens they can use. Thanks, Nikon!
This is an interesting gallery that gives me a very good understanding about what this lens can and can't do. My opinion? I'm impressed. Think I'll get one of these lenses. Thanks for sharing these very nice photos. V