Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX APO RF Lens Sample Photos and Specifications

photo sharing and upload

picture albums

photo forums

search pictures

popular photos

photography help

login

The PBase Camera Museum is intended to be a resource about all camera equipment.
You can help by leaving a comment here including any information you know about this camera equipment.
Please do not post anything that contains copyrighted work for which you do not have permission to publish.
Your comments may be assimilated in to other parts of the PBase Camera Museum but will also remain here in their original form with credit to you.
Contact cameras@pbase.com

All Cameras >> Sigma >> Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX APO RF

Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX APO RF Lens Sample Photos

u38/equipment/upload/24870919.50_500EX_mdl.jpg

Lens: 50-500mm f/4

Random Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX APO RF Samples from 21009 available Photos more

Comments

Chuck Lantz		19-Nov-2009 18:01
I've used the 50-500 for over four years, and I generally agree with Paul's comments, except for a couple of things. First of all, the 50-500 can do great sunsets, as long as you're careful about lens flare. I block the flare with my hand, keeping it just outside the image frame. You can get sharp shots at f/5.6 and f/6.7 if you back the lens off just a bit from full 500mm. There seems to be some "wiggle room" when it's fully extended, but if you twist it back 1/4 inch or so, the shot will be sharper. The speed of the AF depends somewhat on the camera you're using. I shoot with both a Sigma SD9 and SD14, and the AF is noticeably slower with the SD9.

Paul Pagano		30-Dec-2007 17:54
Oh, I didn't notice this until it was pointed out to me...sorry for such a long delay I am still learning about all the pbase functions! On the lens. I like it for several reasons and I also have found some limitations. I like that: 1) It can zoom from 50-500 which helps to not have to move to get a good image especially when subjects move such as with birds. 2) It is pretty sharp at f/8 and up and in good light. 3) The color rendition is good (except don't try it for sunsets). 4) Chromatic aberrations are very well controlled. I don't like that: 1) It isn't that sharp at 500mm wide open at f/6.7. 2) AF is a bit slow with the K10D. I don't know if its the cam, the lens or both. 3) You really need good light for quality images. The important thing to remember is that for the price (around $1000.00 US) it isn't matched. If I had unlimited funds, I'd probably try the Sigma 300 f/2.8 with the matched teleconverters or the Sigma 500mm f/4.5. Again, these are several thousand more. All in all, it is a better than average lens.

Paul Pagano		30-Dec-2007 17:50
Oh, I didn't notice this until it was pointed out to me...sorry for such a long delay I am still learning about all the pbase functions! On the lens. I like it for several reasons and I also have found some limitations. I like that: 1) It can zoom from 50-500 which helps to not have to move to get a good image. 2) It is pretty sharp at f/8 and up. 3) The color rendition is good (except don't try it for sunsets). I don't like that: 1) It isn't that sharp at 500mm wide open at f/6.7. 2) AF is a bit slow with the K10D. I don't know if its the cam, the lens or both.

Guest		01-Aug-2007 19:48
send some feedback on this lens please

All photos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission from the photographer.
These photos are are a guide to what these cameras are capable of, but may not fully represent the camera due to post-processing, scanning, or photographic technique.
All brands are trademarked by their owners.
These pages are not sponsored or approved by the manufacturers.
Other content Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006, pbase.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Contact cameras@pbase.com to contribute data or photos of cameras.