Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM Lens Sample Photos and Specifications

Guest		27-Aug-2006 09:50
The colors are a bit dark. Canon 135 f/2.8 SF has much better color rendition.

Guest		24-Aug-2006 13:48
The 100 f/2.8 macro is very sharp, even for general shooting, so it works great for portraits, too. When I'm not using a zoom, this is my walkaround lens for people, relatively tight scenes and even indoor sports. Think of it as a great lens that also shoots macro than the other way around. Hard to beat that versatility at the price. But it comes into its own at close distances. If you've never had a macro lens, you'll run around shooting everything in sight because everything looks new from a macro perspective. Canon has several macro lenses. I prefer the 100 mm over shorter lenses because I don't have to get quite as close to that bee or wasp. The 180 mm gives you even more distance from your subject, more background blur and amazing sharpness. But it's much more expensive and in most cases you'll need a tripod, and I shoot a lot of improptu macros as I'm hiking. For extreme closeups with larger-than-life images, there's the MP-E 65. It goes up to 5X, compared to the 100mm's 1X, but you lose autofocus with this lens. In fact, you set your magnification and then move the camera until the object is in focus! As you get beyond about 2X, the viewfinder gets fairly dark. If you're doing still life macro work, it's amazing. I'll probably get one someday for shooting my mineral colletion. One thing to keep in mind with any macro is that because of the close distances, you're often in lower light conditions. Althought it's fairly pricey, I'm using the MT-24 EX, which lets you adjust the direction of the twin flashes. The MR-14EX ring light is a couple hundred dollars cheaper but will produce a slightly flatter image. And you can always use one of the standard flashes, though the closeness of your subject may cause some odd shadows. Next Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .http://www.redopinion.com/?s=Canon+EF+100mm+f%2F2.8+Macro+USM+Lens&searchbutton=go%21 _

Guest		26-Apr-2006 01:40
A little disappointing. It seems like an odd combination – 100mm and f/2. I’m still trying to figure out how to use it. It’s a great lens when I use it, but I’m not sure why I bought it.